2012
DOI: 10.1177/1040638711435807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the Ceditest® FMDV type O and FMDV-NS enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of antibodies against Foot-and-mouth disease virus in selected livestock and wildlife species in Uganda

Abstract: Abstract. Diagnosis and control of Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) requires rapid and sensitive diagnostic tests. Two antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, Ceditest® FMDV-NS for the detection of antibodies against the nonstructural proteins of all FMDV serotypes and Ceditest® FMDV type O for the detection of antibodies against serotype O, were evaluated under African endemic conditions where the presence of multiple serotypes and the use of nonpurified vaccines complicate serological dia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the 60–90% prevalence of antibodies against FMDV NSPs in unvaccinated herds from Bukedea, Isingiro, Kumi and Rakai districts indicates that the sampling took place after considerable spread of the infection within the herds, while the lower seroprevalence consistently observed in herds from Gomba (29%) and Sembabule (24%) districts, as well as in the non‐vaccinated herd in Kiruhura (45%), accords with sampling in an earlier phase of the outbreak (Sorensen et al., ). The very high prevalence of anti‐NSP antibodies in herd Kr.2 in Kiruhura district, which last had an outbreak in 1991 but where the cattle are vaccinated on a yearly basis, may be attributed to repeated use of non‐purified vaccines (Sutmoller et al., ; Ayebazibwe et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the 60–90% prevalence of antibodies against FMDV NSPs in unvaccinated herds from Bukedea, Isingiro, Kumi and Rakai districts indicates that the sampling took place after considerable spread of the infection within the herds, while the lower seroprevalence consistently observed in herds from Gomba (29%) and Sembabule (24%) districts, as well as in the non‐vaccinated herd in Kiruhura (45%), accords with sampling in an earlier phase of the outbreak (Sorensen et al., ). The very high prevalence of anti‐NSP antibodies in herd Kr.2 in Kiruhura district, which last had an outbreak in 1991 but where the cattle are vaccinated on a yearly basis, may be attributed to repeated use of non‐purified vaccines (Sutmoller et al., ; Ayebazibwe et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tests can also differentiate infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA test) [33], however, in Eastern Africa, interpretation of NSP-test results is complicated by the frequent use of non-purified vaccines which elicit antibodies against NSPs, thereby limiting the DIVA application of these tests [20,34,35]. Furthermore, antibodies against NSPs do not appear until day 8–9 after infection [36], thus, to be useful, these tests should only be used for sera sampled in the late subacute and chronic phases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the NSPs of FMDV, 3ABC polyprotein is reported to be the most antigenic and the most reliable marker for DIVA. Various formats of ELISA based on the 3ABC polyprotein were developed, including the LPB-ELISA, SPC-ELISA, and direct/indirect sandwich ELISA, all of which demonstrated good sensitivity, specificity, and capability for DIVA in various animals (56,67,68,(116)(117)(118)(119)(120)(121)(122)(123)(124)(125). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays based on 3ABC have some added advantages over other NSPs including superior longevity of anti-3ABC antibody in infected animals compared to 2C, 3A, 3D, and Lb, and all infected cattle were shown to develop 3ABC-specific antibody at some points following the infection.…”
Section: Differentiation/discrimination Of Infected From Vaccinated Amentioning
confidence: 99%