2012
DOI: 10.1080/17415977.2012.686997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the linear sampling method to identify cracks with impedance boundary conditions

Abstract: International audienceWe use the linear sampling method (LSM) to identify a crack with impedance boundary conditions from far-field measurements at a fixed frequency. This article extends the work of Cakoni-Colton [F. Cakoni and D. Colton, The linear sampling method for cracks, Inverse Probl. 19 (2003), pp. 279-295] where LSM has been used to reconstruct a crack with impedance boundary conditions on one side of the crack and a Dirichlet boundary condition on the other one. In addition, we present two methods t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fracture is illuminated by a set of incident plane waves (1), taking k s such that the ratio between the shear wavelength and the arclength of Γ is λ s / = 0.7. Thus-induced scattered field is then measured in terms of the far-field pattern,ũ ∞ , given by (7)- (9). The spatial density of sensory data, for both illumination and sensing purposes, is given by N θ ×N φ = 25×12 directions given by the polar (θ j , j = 1, .…”
Section: Numerical Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fracture is illuminated by a set of incident plane waves (1), taking k s such that the ratio between the shear wavelength and the arclength of Γ is λ s / = 0.7. Thus-induced scattered field is then measured in terms of the far-field pattern,ũ ∞ , given by (7)- (9). The spatial density of sensory data, for both illumination and sensing purposes, is given by N θ ×N φ = 25×12 directions given by the polar (θ j , j = 1, .…”
Section: Numerical Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, it is noteworthy that some anomaly-indicator functionals -such as those featured by the FM [34], (G)LSM [16,47] and TS [46] are largely insensitive to the (unknown) boundary condition of a hidden anomaly. For instance, [15,9] demonstrate that the LSM is successful in reconstructing electromagnetic obstacles and cracks regardless of their boundary condition. Recent advancements on the recovery of boundary (or interfacial) conditions are, on the other hand, mostly optimization-based as proposed in the context of acoustic and electromagnetic inverse scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, suppose that there exists a ∈H 1/2 (Γ) 3 such that H * (a) = 0. In light of (19) and (21), it is apparent that H * is nothing else but the far-field operator stemming from the double-layer potential…”
Section: Key Properties For the Application Of Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Σ(ξ, y) is the (third-order) elastodynamic fundamental stress tensor given in Appendix B. By virtue of definition (19), vanishing far-field pattern of V (a) implies, by the Rellich Lemma and the unique continuation principle, that V (a) = 0 in R 3 \Γ. Owing to the fundamental jump property of double-layer potentials by which V = a, one obtains a = 0 which guarantees the injectivity of H * .…”
Section: Key Properties For the Application Of Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our reconstruction method is a modified linear sampling method, adapted to our problem where we already know the interface Γ and only look for the delaminated part Γ 0 . The linear sampling method and factorization method have been used to reconstruct cracks or screens with various types of boundary conditions [8], [10], [12], [27] and [33] (see also the monographs [13] and [15]). Although numerically both the linear sampling method and factorization method provide similar reconstruction results, the factorization method is mathematically more satisfactory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%