1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199907/08)27:6<293::aid-jcu1>3.0.co;2-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of musculoskeletal sonography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
1
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…14 A linear transducer with a high frequency was selected as it provides a uniform, wide field of view with a superior near-field resolution for imaging superficial structures, 15 such as adipose tissue. Ultrasound was selected as it was noninvasive, portable for use in the field and did not involve radiation.…”
Section: Internal Foot Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 A linear transducer with a high frequency was selected as it provides a uniform, wide field of view with a superior near-field resolution for imaging superficial structures, 15 such as adipose tissue. Ultrasound was selected as it was noninvasive, portable for use in the field and did not involve radiation.…”
Section: Internal Foot Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UBM frequencies used in most applications vary from 40 to 60MHz, corresponding to a resolution on the order of micrometers. That range of frequencies allows the generation of images of muscular tissue of small animals similar to those acquired with conventional ultrasound for humans (Megliola et al, 2006;Jacobson, 1999;Hashimoto et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1980 it was first discovered that diseased muscles showed a different ultrasound appearance compared to healthy muscles [11]. Next to neuromuscular disorders, malignancies, infections and hematomas and ruptures of the musculoskeletal system can also be detected with ultrasound [7,9,10,24]. Currently, ultrasound is widely available and ultrasound techniques have further improved, resulting in display of muscle tissue with resolutions up to 0.1 mm [8], which is higher than the resolution that can be achieved with for example 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which has a resolution up to 0.2 x 0.2 x 1.0 mm [38].…”
Section: Ultrasound Of Normal Muscle Tissue 2 Muscle Ultrasound In Nmentioning
confidence: 79%