1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.1995.tb00016.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applied Computer Diagnostics — Theoretical Foundations and Future Perspectives

Abstract: The paper reviews and discusses a number of issues relating to the use of computer technology to assist the process of assessing psychologically relevant variables -computer-assisted diagnostics. A definition of computer-assisted diagnostics is given and theoretical developments are discussed. The paper emphasizes the need to consider theoretical issues relating to a number of domains: theory of content, test theory, human-computer interaction, programming theory, instructional theory, normative theory and sit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first type encompasses studies that develop and prove the validity of computerized testing in contexts such as secretarial assessments and military assessments . The second type encompasses studies that compare different formats, and, despite some concerns regarding human-computer interaction Jäger, Krieger, & Dlugosch, 1995), they generally found no difference between computerized and pen-and-paper testing if the test is untimed (Jones, Brasher, & Huff, 2002;. However, we need to consider differences in the context such as the possibility to cheat in unsupervised Web-based testing scenarios.…”
Section: Candidate Management Pre-selection and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first type encompasses studies that develop and prove the validity of computerized testing in contexts such as secretarial assessments and military assessments . The second type encompasses studies that compare different formats, and, despite some concerns regarding human-computer interaction Jäger, Krieger, & Dlugosch, 1995), they generally found no difference between computerized and pen-and-paper testing if the test is untimed (Jones, Brasher, & Huff, 2002;. However, we need to consider differences in the context such as the possibility to cheat in unsupervised Web-based testing scenarios.…”
Section: Candidate Management Pre-selection and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%