1985
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(85)90140-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apportionment of rainfall in central Himalayan forests (India)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, it is quite difficult not to disturb field samples when taking them to the lab. Third, evaporation during the rainfall events is not taken into account, which is also the case for the method of Pathak et al (1985), who measured that 8-12% of the net precipitation was evaporated. Despite these arguments, Helvey and Patric (1965) stress that the difference is caused by the "interface effect".…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, it is quite difficult not to disturb field samples when taking them to the lab. Third, evaporation during the rainfall events is not taken into account, which is also the case for the method of Pathak et al (1985), who measured that 8-12% of the net precipitation was evaporated. Despite these arguments, Helvey and Patric (1965) stress that the difference is caused by the "interface effect".…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way Putuhena and Cordery (1996) found average storage capacities of 2.8 mm for pine and 1.7 mm for eucalyptus forest floors. Examples of the second category are for example carried out by Pathak et al (1985), who measured the weight of a sample tray before and after a rainfall event. They found litter interception values of 8%-12% of the net precipitation.…”
Section: Forest Floor Interception Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathak et al (1984Pathak et al ( ,1985 evaluated the fluxes of overland flow, sediment output and nutrient losses from six forested sites in the Central Himalayas during monsoon seasons of 1981and 1982. Jenkins et al (1995 collected comprehensive data on major ion chemistry from head water streams in the Everest, Annapurna, Langtang and Nuwakot regions of the middle and high mountains of Nepal Himalayas.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors also published data about litter interception of gross precipitation or annual value (Table 4). Litter interception data of the net precipitation (throughfall) was 8-12% in mixed oak stands (Pathak et al 1985), and 34% for November 2004 in beech forests (Gerrits et al 2006). The comparison of our data is uncertain because of different climatic conditions and tree species (mainly due to the weight of litter) and different methods of measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%