2012
DOI: 10.3390/mi3040615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches and Challenges of Engineering Implantable Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) Drug Delivery Systems for in Vitro and in Vivo Applications

Abstract: Despite the advancements made in drug delivery systems over the years, many challenges remain in drug delivery systems for treating chronic diseases at the personalized medicine level. The current urgent need is to develop novel strategies for targeted therapy of chronic diseases. Due to their unique properties, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology has been recently engineered as implantable drug delivery systems for disease therapy. This review examines the challenges faced in implementing implant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application examples include continuous pressure monitoring (Mokwa, 2007;Gembaczka et al, 2013), nerve and muscle stimulation (Eick et al, 2009) and drug delivery systems (Hang Tng et al, 2012). Usually medically approved micro-electronic implants such as pacemakers (Park and Lakes, 2007), cochlear implants (Loeb, 1990) or brain stimulators (Rezai et al, 2002) are encapsulated by non-flexible materials such as titanium or ceramics with considerable sidewall thickness in the range of 100 µm to 1 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application examples include continuous pressure monitoring (Mokwa, 2007;Gembaczka et al, 2013), nerve and muscle stimulation (Eick et al, 2009) and drug delivery systems (Hang Tng et al, 2012). Usually medically approved micro-electronic implants such as pacemakers (Park and Lakes, 2007), cochlear implants (Loeb, 1990) or brain stimulators (Rezai et al, 2002) are encapsulated by non-flexible materials such as titanium or ceramics with considerable sidewall thickness in the range of 100 µm to 1 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since an external power source is not required, it is possible to for such devices to have minimal footprint. [ 13 ] However, the drug release mechanisms often limit performance to low release rates and slow response. [ 14 ] The drug delivery rate is pre-determined by the selected materials, fabrication methods, or drug formulation, and is highly dependent on the properties of the fl uid transported and the delivery site's environmental properties (e.g., temperature, pH, saccharide concentration, and antigen concentration) that fl uctuate over the course of treatment.…”
Section: Non-powered Mems Drug Delivery Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active devices are reservoir-based drug delivery devices; they contain an actuator due which the device is able to perform active operation [41]. Active devices can be refillable which eliminates the need for a very large reservoir moreover active devices can be tuned according to the particular need of the patient [40]. Passive devices release drugs in a more controlled way and they rely on diffusion process for release of the drug.…”
Section: Implantable Devices For Drug Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implantable devices are designed for applications -in vivo and in vitro [39], [40]. The current trends in the technology which focus on developing a wireless system for energy and data transmission facilitate the in vivo application of these devices.…”
Section: Implantable Devices For Drug Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%