2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

APT analysis of WC–Co based cemented carbides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co segregation is predicted to all model WC/WC grain boundaries in 0.5 monolayer proportion, in accordance with experiments [26,73]. The average grain boundary energy taking this into account is 2.3 J m −2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Co segregation is predicted to all model WC/WC grain boundaries in 0.5 monolayer proportion, in accordance with experiments [26,73]. The average grain boundary energy taking this into account is 2.3 J m −2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the case of M23C6 the steel sample had to be carefully ion milled until a carbide could be observed close to the tip apex. Needle samples of WC were prepared by a combination of electropolishing and FIB [21]. In all cases the final milling was carried out using a lower voltage (5 kV) to limit Ga implantation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APT specimens of materials C1 and C3 were produced through a combination of electropolishing, back polishing and ion polishing [11]. The specimens were analyzed in an Imago LEAP 3000X HR instrument using 200 kHz 0.35 nJ laser pulsing with the specimen temperature at 66 K. The data was analyzed using the Imago IVAS 3.4.3 software.…”
Section: Experimental and Theoretical Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%