2021
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2021.3095469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arbitrary Wave Transformations With Huygens’ Metasurfaces Through Surface-Wave Optimization

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, losses are estimated to be around 7.4% (3.3% Ohmic losses in the wires and the ground plane and 4.1% in the dielectric). This constitutes a promising result, as multi-layer transmissive metasurfaces using auxiliary surface waves for similar functionality exhibit significantly higher losses [44]. In addition, the frequency variation of directivity is plotted in Fig.…”
Section: A Chebyshev Array Patternmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Specifically, losses are estimated to be around 7.4% (3.3% Ohmic losses in the wires and the ground plane and 4.1% in the dielectric). This constitutes a promising result, as multi-layer transmissive metasurfaces using auxiliary surface waves for similar functionality exhibit significantly higher losses [44]. In addition, the frequency variation of directivity is plotted in Fig.…”
Section: A Chebyshev Array Patternmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This implies that the RIS needs to introduce local power amplifications (a negative resistance is equivalent to an amplification) or local power losses along the surface S, depending on the desired angle of reflection for a given angle of incidence. By assuming, e.g., normal incidence (i.e., θ i (r Tx ) = 0), we evince that a unit amplitude reflection coefficient corresponds to an engineered surface S with a positive surface impedance, which implies that no power amplifiers or other sophisticated methods for creating virtual power amplifications through the use of, e.g., surface waves [27], [62], [63], are needed to realize the RIS. The design constraints to be imposed on Z(r Rx , y, r Tx )) for ensuring that the RIS has a high power efficiency for any pair (θ i (r Tx ), θ r (r Rx )) are discussed in the next sub-sections.…”
Section: A Electromagnetically Consistent Modeling Of Rissmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power amplification can be virtual, e.g., by using surface waves, or can be realized through actual power amplifiers [27]. The corresponding power flow in (63) is oscillatory in [−L y , L y ] as well.…”
Section: B Power Efficiency and Reradiated Power Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface waves supported by beamforming metasurfaces reshape the local power density by redistributing power transversally along the metasurface from places where local loss is needed to places where local gain is needed, a concept first introduced in [9]. For example, the metasurfaces in [3]- [5], [8]- [23] use surface waves to control either the near or far-fields in a passive and lossless manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of not modeling spatial dispersion are explained in [6], where the authors employed conducting baffles to separate unit cells thereby eliminating non-local responses. The baffle approach was also adopted in [2], [3], [20], [24], to achieve agreement between the homogenized models and the realized metasurfaces. The solution presented in this paper is to use integral equations to model the metasurfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%