2003
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0092.00190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaeology Unfolding: Diversity and the Loss of Isolation

Abstract: Summary.  British historical archaeology has seen new theoretical engagement in recent years. A diverse and distinctive body of theory has developed in this increasingly vibrant and international area of study, testing disciplinary boundaries, especially with history, social anthropology and material culture studies. This paper takes stock of three distinct processes within the new historical archaeology: the birth of material history, the loss of antiquity, and the loss of isolation. The implications of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their discussion also references Barbara Little's comparative multi-local approaches between Annapolis homes and workplaces (Little 1998;DeCunzo & Ernstein 2006:259). In addition to the Cambridge Companion, several other examples exist, including those where multi-sited archeology is used similarly to, if not interchangeably, with multi-scalar analyses, as in Hicks' landscape archeology at Ironbridge Gorge (Hicks 2003) and Matthews' discussion of ideology and landscape in Annapolis (Matthews 2002).…”
Section: Multi-sited Archeology: Issues In Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their discussion also references Barbara Little's comparative multi-local approaches between Annapolis homes and workplaces (Little 1998;DeCunzo & Ernstein 2006:259). In addition to the Cambridge Companion, several other examples exist, including those where multi-sited archeology is used similarly to, if not interchangeably, with multi-scalar analyses, as in Hicks' landscape archeology at Ironbridge Gorge (Hicks 2003) and Matthews' discussion of ideology and landscape in Annapolis (Matthews 2002).…”
Section: Multi-sited Archeology: Issues In Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of these comparisons permit access to deep, complex, and interactive histories (see Hicks 2003;Wolf 1982).…”
Section: Multi-sited Archeology En Routementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ferrandiz 2006;Gonzalez-Ruibal 2005 and the UK (e.g. Buchli 1999Buchli , 2007aBuchli , 2007bBradley et al 2004;Hicks 2003;Graves-Brown 2007aPenrose with contributors 2007;Symonds 2004). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My suggestion here is that both approaches, teleological or presentist, are mistaken, in that they neglect the primary role of the material production of archaeological knowledge -practices that are usually glossed as nothing more than objective documentation or recording. On the contrary, archaeological knowledge, always already implicated in the metamorphosis of material, human, sociocultural, physical and natural environments (Hicks 2003, Hicks andMcAtackney 2007), emerges through techniques of temporal protention, central devices for which include the museum and the archive (Hicks 2013) but also encompass the site and the landscape, transformed. Archaeological knowledge requires the creation of these proxy terrains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%