2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvlsi.2020.3015494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture, Chip, and Package Codesign Flow for Interposer-Based 2.5-D Chiplet Integration Enabling Heterogeneous IP Reuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the chiplet-based architecture, the max wirelength can be much longer than that of SoC. For example, in the chiplet-based architecture containing 64 cores [24], the max wirelength can reach about 10 mm.…”
Section: Simchiplet: Chiplet Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the chiplet-based architecture, the max wirelength can be much longer than that of SoC. For example, in the chiplet-based architecture containing 64 cores [24], the max wirelength can reach about 10 mm.…”
Section: Simchiplet: Chiplet Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, according to the HPWL between the chiplets on the silicon interposer and the relationship between the latency and wirelength [24], we map the wirelength into six ranges in Moreover, the power consumption on wires is highly related to the wirelength, and according to [24], the power consumption increases linearly by 0.037 pJ/bit×mm. Therefore, moving the chiplet-pair with a higher communication frequency closer will decrease the power consumption and improve the overall performance.…”
Section: Simchiplet: Chiplet Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in chiplet-based integration, it is highly common for each chiplet to have dedicated regulators [ 96 ]. These regulators are typically placed within the interposer to save area and realize passive devices with high quality factors [ 97 ], as shown in Figure 8 . This technique, however, introduces an important security vulnerability by providing a more direct approach for power covert channels.…”
Section: Covert Channel Attacks In 25d/3d Icsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substance of a 2.5 D integration is called silicon interposer, which consists of the top to bottom through silicon via (TSV) and the routings on redistribution layer (RDL), as the wafer-level processing is significantly accurate compared with the traditional printed circuit board (PCB) process, detector arrays with ignorable dead space and extremely short front-back signal readout can be implemented. However, the state-of-the-art silicon interposer is normally below 100 µ m thick, while the size can only reach up to 50 × 50 mm (Coudrain et al , 2019; Lee et al , 2016; Kim et al , 2020), which leads to a few issues that, for one, the current thickness is not able to sustain its own mechanical strength with the detector/readout array often sits as standalone in large science facilities instead of on a rigid PCB in consumer electronics, as for another, the target interposer size should be as large as possible to reduce the expanses on the installation of the components. Therefore, a moderation of the current interposer toward large-sized, standalone properties is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%