2021
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2021-805
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arctic spring and summertime aerosol optical depth baseline from long-term observations and model reanalyses, with implications for the impact of regional biomass burning processes

Abstract: Abstract. We present an Arctic aerosol optical depth (AOD) climatology and trend analysis for 2003–2019 spring and summertime periods derived from a combination of multi-agency aerosol reanalyses, remote sensing retrievals, and ground observations. This includes the U.S. Navy Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System ReAnalysis version 1 (NAAPS-RA v1), the NASA Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), and the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service ReAnalysis (CAMSRA)… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, measurements of aerosol optical properties in the Arctic provide high spatial and long-term climatological information important for model simulations, however remain mainly site-specific and do not often extend fully to the central Arctic Ocean [21][22][23] . Additionally, while land-based observatories, provide climatological information about Arctic particle size distribution and mass composition that is highly valuable for understanding Arctic aerosol processes and for modeling their climate effects [24][25][26] , they are not necessarily representative for aerosol characteristics and impacts over the remote central Arctic Ocean.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, measurements of aerosol optical properties in the Arctic provide high spatial and long-term climatological information important for model simulations, however remain mainly site-specific and do not often extend fully to the central Arctic Ocean [21][22][23] . Additionally, while land-based observatories, provide climatological information about Arctic particle size distribution and mass composition that is highly valuable for understanding Arctic aerosol processes and for modeling their climate effects [24][25][26] , they are not necessarily representative for aerosol characteristics and impacts over the remote central Arctic Ocean.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As models and remote sensing products are gradually being combined in research [27,28], it is anticipated that coupled analyses will become a tool that is increasingly used in the community. This paper provides a comparative analysis of 550 nm AOD 550 , η 550, and corresponding FAOD 550 and CAOD 550 , from the perspectives of the two global operational products: (1) the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Version 6.1 dark target (DT) aerosol retrievals (henceforth MODIS DT provided within Level 2 product known as MOD04/MYD04; [29]); (2) the corresponding consensus speciated AOD products drawn from International Cooperative for Aerosol Prediction Multi Model ensemble (ICAP-MME; [30,31]) with members that utilize MODIS total AOD in assimilation (i.e., generating the so-called "core four consensus" or C4C of the ICAP-MME).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…land and ocean. A few recent studies have used such AOD products (e.g., (Glantz et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2016;Sand et al, 2017;Xian et al, 2021)) over open ocean and snow-and ice free surfaces, and make a valuable contribution to closing the data gap mentioned above. However, these AOD products are not suitable over the cryosphere due to an inadequate parameterization of the surface reflectance over residual snow-and ice-covered areas (Mei et al, 2020a) and Arctic cloud cover (Jafariserajehlou et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, there have been no attempts to apply these algorithms systematically in the Arctic cryosphere to fill the data gap, identified above. Studies using active satellite remote sensing such as Sand et al (2017) and Xian et al (2021) are valuable, but the observational data are limited over the Arctic cryosphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation