2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Distributed Ledger Technologies the panacea for food traceability?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
124
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
124
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are various challenges for the wider adoption of blockchain technology, which are mentioned in related work under study and also in relevant survey and position papers (Chang, Iakovou and Shi 2019), (Galvez, Mejuto and Simal-Gandara 2018), (Hald and Kinra 2019), (Tribis, El Bouchti and Bouayad 2018), (Zhao, et al 2019), (Pearson, et al 2019). Table 2 lists potential benefits and existing barriers for the use of blockchain in agriculture and the food supply chain, as identified in Section 5 and Sections 6.1-6.5 respectively, as well as in (Chang, Iakovou and Shi 2019), (Pearson, et al 2019). A case study in the Netherlands revealed that SME lack the required size, scale or know-how needed, in order to invest in blockchain by themselves (Ge, et al 2017).…”
Section: Challenges and Open Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are various challenges for the wider adoption of blockchain technology, which are mentioned in related work under study and also in relevant survey and position papers (Chang, Iakovou and Shi 2019), (Galvez, Mejuto and Simal-Gandara 2018), (Hald and Kinra 2019), (Tribis, El Bouchti and Bouayad 2018), (Zhao, et al 2019), (Pearson, et al 2019). Table 2 lists potential benefits and existing barriers for the use of blockchain in agriculture and the food supply chain, as identified in Section 5 and Sections 6.1-6.5 respectively, as well as in (Chang, Iakovou and Shi 2019), (Pearson, et al 2019). A case study in the Netherlands revealed that SME lack the required size, scale or know-how needed, in order to invest in blockchain by themselves (Ge, et al 2017).…”
Section: Challenges and Open Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, permanent data visibility might compromise privacy issues and could eventually strengthen the surveillance power of centralized entities. On the other hand, large corporations might implement private and permissioned blockchains that could underpin oligopolistic practices (Pearson, et al 2019).…”
Section: Governance and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is because the transfer of data cannot now be corrupted, edited or changed if supply chain assessments use standardised distributed ledger technologies (DLT's) that use real-time cloud computing platforms [18]. The inclusion of metrics that can report security and sustainability outcomes of different food and feed categories in these systems is nothing short of revolutionary because of the ability to scale sustainability assessment across supply chains [19]. These all need suitable metrics to be developed that measure impacts across supply chains; these are described in the methodology reported in this research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%