1990
DOI: 10.1109/irps.1990.363507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Are Electromigration Failures Lognormally Distributed?"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values presented in table 7 allow the determination ofconfidence levels in predicting the time-period in the target life of deposition. The figures presented are a subset from a large number of samples which allows the statistical inference of hypothesis testing on a normal distribution [12].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Gradients And Interceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values presented in table 7 allow the determination ofconfidence levels in predicting the time-period in the target life of deposition. The figures presented are a subset from a large number of samples which allows the statistical inference of hypothesis testing on a normal distribution [12].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Gradients And Interceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most literature, the validity of this distribution is assumed, although several researchers have questioned its validity and expended considerable efforts trying to obtain alternative distributions such as the weibull and the multilognormal [5] [6] [7] . Some researche rs have also pointed out that the conventional two parameter lognormal or weibull distributions may not be sufficient, and have provided evidence that three parameter distributions are more appropriate [8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two data points at the void sizes of about 50% and 80%, in addition to the known boundary conditions of zero probability of failure at defect when the void is non-existent and definite failure at defect in the limiting case of a 100% defect. The mcdel curve in the figure is, Pf(;) (5) where d is the extent of the linewidth, w, taken away by the void. The accuracy of this fit is questionable considering the small number of data points available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The importance of different stressing conditions has also been identified. In the last several years, there have been hundreds of papers written on this subject.…”
Section: Introduchonmentioning
confidence: 99%