Are the Sustainable Development Goals self‐consistent and mutually achievable?

Abstract

On September 18, 2015, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which sets out wide‐ranging ambitions for global development. In response to the 2030 Agenda, the International Council for Science (ICSU), in partnership with the International Social Science Council (ISSC), subsequently published a detailed commentary on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the linkages between them. The ICSU–ISSC Report raises the possibility that the SDG framework as a whole might not be internally self‐consistent, and the report itself calls for a wider “systems perspective.” In this paper, we use the ICSU commentary as the basis for a quantitative theoretical analysis of the SDGs from a systems perspective. We provide a mathematical definition of self‐consistency and show that the linkages we infer from the ICSU–ISSC report imply that the SDGs are not self‐consistent. However, using a simple dynamical model to investigate the combined outcome of direct efforts at tackling each Goal and the indirect effects on progress due to network effects, we show that network effects could be used to secure better outcomes on every Goal than would be possible if linkages between Goals did not exist at all. These better outcomes would be possible through an unequal, targeted reallocation of direct efforts. Unequal distribution of direct effort can therefore make the SDGs mutually achievable. These conclusions contribute to the ongoing debate on the development of global strategies for the achievement of the 2030 Agenda, their implementation, and the definition and monitoring of progress towards the Goals.

Transnational youth networks: an evolving form of public diplomacy to accelerate the Sustainable Development Goals

“…Specifically, most recent TYNs also focus particularly on advancing the UN SDGs agenda (see Table 1 and Ref (Gad, 2009)). While in principle the SDGs seem highly interconnected, weighted network linkage analysis showed that there is a great asymmetry between SDGs 1-3 and the remaining goals (Dawes, 2020). Under this model, concentrating global efforts in SDGs 4-16 strongly impact SDGs 1-3, although there is little correlation in the opposite direction.…”

“…Emotional intelligence (and concomitantly empathy) as well as leadership skills are among the key cross-functional skills required for the future jobs (The Future of Jobs Report 2018) and, hence, experiential education on these areas are quite important for the TYNs members development. Moreover, as these networks advance educational skills globally they may indirectly impact SDGs 1-3 (Dawes, 2020). In addition, as they focus on promoting projects aligned with all UN SDGs, it implies that they can have a vast impact on the agenda.…”

Kua takoto te mānuka: mātauranga Māori in New Zealand ecology

“…Complex systems research on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals demonstrates that prioritising social justice will create wins for biodiversity (Bennett et al 2019;Dawes 2019). Being able to incorporate understandings from multiple knowledge systems is vital for a thorough understanding of the natural world (Allen et al 2014), and therefore critical in advancing ecology in Aotearoa.…”

Health Inequality as a Large-Scale Outcome of Complex Social Systems: Lessons for Action on the Sustainable Development Goals

“…From what we know about health inequality, linear, siloed approaches to solutions will not work. More than this, a reified understanding of interactions between and among goals is not sufficient for effective action [82]. Rather, action needs to happen on real systems focused on real interactions in the context of system behaviour-real human systems that exhibit emergence, feedbacks and sensitivity to initial conditions.…”