2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24592-8_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are There Any Differences in Data Set Retrieval Compared to Well-Known Literature Retrieval?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Creating queries. Users interact with datasets in a different manner than they interact with documents [78]. While this study is limited to social scientists, it indicates that users have a higher investment in the results, and are thus willing to spend more time searching.…”
Section: Queryingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Creating queries. Users interact with datasets in a different manner than they interact with documents [78]. While this study is limited to social scientists, it indicates that users have a higher investment in the results, and are thus willing to spend more time searching.…”
Section: Queryingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(3) LOD Backend: The link infrastructure reuses the InFoLiS infrastructure 16 consisting of a Node.js based API backend which provides RESTful web services and a LOD (linked open data) representation of the data. The data is stored in a MongoDB in an RDF-based data model.…”
Section: Link Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, we conducted two observational studies, telephone interviews, a diary study, several iterations of click dummy tests and three comprehensive usability studies. All participants were social scientists with 16 The user studies to understand the context of use and to specify user requirements show the diversity of information needs in the field of Social Science. We categorized the collected information needs into the following categories:…”
Section: User-centered Design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Wynholds et al (2012) show that, in the context of digital libraries, seeking and using documents and data for research purposes are different in terms of information needs, processes and required level of support. In user studies with social scientists, (Kern and Mathiak, 2015) found that the quantity and quality of metadata is more critical in dataset search than in literature search, where convenience prevails. Empirical social scientists in that study were willing to put more effort into the retrieval of research data than in literature retrieval.…”
Section: Selecting and Making Sense Of Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has focused more on extractive methods as abstractive methods are rather complex (Gambhir and Gupta, 2017). Based on existing studies in human data interaction, we believe that meaningful dataset summaries likely require abstractive elements including quality statements, descriptive statistics or topical coverage of a dataset (Gregory et al, 2017;Kern and Mathiak, 2015;Koesten et al, 2017;Boukhelifa et al, 2017).…”
Section: Automatic Summary Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%