2010
DOI: 10.1080/19312451003680665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Argument and Ethnopolitical Conflict

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge no one has done a discursive analysis of Malaysians of different ethnic/religious backgrounds in dialogue. As ordinary Malaysians they draw upon their own personal experiences as well as on broader ethnopolitical discourses in criticizing, defending, or telling their side (Ellis 2006(Ellis ,2010. The issues raised about multiculturalism are unavoidably politicized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To our knowledge no one has done a discursive analysis of Malaysians of different ethnic/religious backgrounds in dialogue. As ordinary Malaysians they draw upon their own personal experiences as well as on broader ethnopolitical discourses in criticizing, defending, or telling their side (Ellis 2006(Ellis ,2010. The issues raised about multiculturalism are unavoidably politicized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Each side may have diverging assessments of the other's accounts. But listening to the other group's perspective is at least a first step toward acknowledging that both sides can have reasonable positions (Ellis 2010). So instead of looking at the rhetoric of political leaders, there is a need to examine how ordinary Malaysians make sense of multiculturalism.…”
Section: Malaysia As a Multicultural Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The politicisation of identity unfolds when subjective forces move to deploy distinctive narratives of culture and history as strategic issues that define themselves as a collective and rationalise their struggle for power (Huddy 2001;Schwartz et al, 2009;Seul, 1999;Simon & Klandermans, 2001). Politicising social identity to establish ethnopolitical consciousness necessitates that subjective forces differentiate their interest from other ethnopolitical subjectivities in a manner that at times spurs 'inter-ethnic' difference and tensions (Ellis, 2010). These views echo earlier analysis illustrating how ethnonationalist 2 and separatist political formations mobilised specific historical narratives and ethno-linguistic distinctions to evoke the sense of difference so great to the extent that they can never be expected to share a territory, let alone power (Hobsbawm & Ranger, 1992;Turton, 1998).…”
Section: Social Identities and Territorial Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%