2013
DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2013.1696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arrivée des malades cancéreux aux stades avancés : tentative d’identification de responsabilité

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be related to the multiple recourses used by patients before the consultation in specialized oncology services. Gombe Mbalawa et al [33] showed that the late diagnosis of breast cancer was largely attributed to the responsibility of health professionals: the hospital personal, the nurses and physicians who work in private (40.8%) and the medical doctor, specialist or not (25.5%) while the direct responsibility of the patient was weak (24.4%) by ignorance or fear of diagnosis. Despite the importance of this study and its potential impact on the quality of care for patients with breast cancer in developing countries, it may have some limitations: first, because of the design which was a retrospective cohort study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be related to the multiple recourses used by patients before the consultation in specialized oncology services. Gombe Mbalawa et al [33] showed that the late diagnosis of breast cancer was largely attributed to the responsibility of health professionals: the hospital personal, the nurses and physicians who work in private (40.8%) and the medical doctor, specialist or not (25.5%) while the direct responsibility of the patient was weak (24.4%) by ignorance or fear of diagnosis. Despite the importance of this study and its potential impact on the quality of care for patients with breast cancer in developing countries, it may have some limitations: first, because of the design which was a retrospective cohort study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%