As Ciências Sociais Nos Últimos 20 Anos: Três Perspectivas

Reis, Elisa; Reis, Fábio Wanderley

doi:10.1590/s0102-69091997000300002

Cited by 18 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Así, el hecho de que las investigacio- Valor en reales del financiamiento del CNPq nes trataran de cuestiones candentes de la sociedad brasileña, sin que haya definición de prioridades temáticas por las instituciones de fomento, revela un determinado grado de autonomía reflexiva. De cierta forma, esta observación ya había sido anticipada en artícu-los y libros anteriores a este estudio, los cuales tratan temas de violencia, medio ambiente y promoción a la investigación (Reis, Reis y Velho 1997, Nowotny, Scott y Gibbons 2001, Sobral 2004.…”

Section: Problemas Sociales Y Sociológicosunclassified

La autonomía reflexiva en el campo de la sociología (2000-2006)

Sobral¹,

Maranhão²

2013

Íconos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fecha de recepción: agosto de 2007 Fecha de aceptación y versión final: abril de 2008Resumen Basado en datos empíricos sobre el financiamiento público federal brasilero para la investigación sociológica en el período 2000-2006, el presente artículo analiza cuál es el tipo de autonomía que existe en un modelo mixto de desenvolvimiento científico y tecnológico. Se define lo que es autonomía reflexiva y se explica por qué dicho concepto es fundamental para el campo científico, desarrollando además una tipología de la autonomía. A continuación se efectúa un análisis del fomento público federal en el área de la sociología, dada la importancia del financiamiento a la investigación para la construcción de la ciencia. Finalmente los resultados evidenciarán tres tendencias del campo de la sociología en relación al fomento y a la retraducción de problemas sociales en problemas sociológicos.Palabras claves: sociología, autonomía reflexiva, modelo mixto, ciencia, tecnología, reflexividad, financiamiento, investigación. AbstractBased on empirical data about Brazilian's federal public funding for sociological research since 2000 to 2006, this article analyzes what kind of autonomy exists in a mixed model of scientific and technological development. It is provided a definition of reflexive autonomy and it is explaned why this concept is important for the scentific field, futhermore a tipology of autonomy is developed. Regarding the centrality of research funding on the development of science, the analysis focus on specific issues related to federal public funding for sociological research. Finally, results indicate three main tendencies in the field of sociology related to funding and translation of social problems into sociological problems.

show abstract

Section: Problemas Sociales Y Sociológicosunclassified

La autonomía reflexiva en el campo de la sociología (2000-2006)

Sobral¹,

Maranhão²

2013

Íconos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Reis (1997) Em particular, nenhum trabalho buscou efetivamente reconstruir o campo da Ciência Política. O termo é usado sem observar as exigências implicadas em seu emprego -em particular responder à questão dos princípios que organizam a produção.…”

unclassified

“…Indícios mais claros são encontrados em Fábio Wanderley Reis (1997), que descreveria as Ciências Sociais brasileiras como "descritivas", "idiográficas", "jornalísticas", "historiográficas" e "etnográficas", destacando o fraco treinamento metodológico, diagnóstico estendido à Ciência Política, na qual faltaria "rigor analítico", "vocação teórica e nomológica" e "cumulatividade". Uma década depois, Gláucio Soares (2005) Em primeiro lugar, a produção é reconstruída identificando-se um espaço relacional de distâncias e oposições entre categorias.…”

unclassified

Tradições Intelectuais na Ciência Política Brasileira Contemporânea

Leite

2017

Dados

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ACiência Política brasileira contemporânea é uma disciplina diversa e recentemente tem atingido um expressivo grau de autonomia. Por um lado, multiplicam-se programas de pós-graduação específicos, destacados das demais Ciências Sociais. Desde 2000, o número de programas de mestrado e de doutorado mais que triplicou. Somente nos últimos seis anos foram fundados 21 programas -mais do que em todo o período de 1967de a 2006de (Marenco, 2015. Por outro, tem-se uma produção complexa e cada vez mais extensa, na qual, além da criação de periódicos especializados, proliferam-se e legitimam-se novas áreas temáticas e coexistem abordagens teórico-metodológicas por vezes diametralmente opostas. Os tempos em que os estudos polí-ticos eram propriedade de alguns poucos pensadores em um regime de produção fundamentalmente escolástico, individual e polivalente vão dando lugar a uma disciplina cada vez mais profissionalizada, baseada em núcleos de pesquisa, marcada pela especialização do conhecimento, mais sensível a demandas técnicas etc.O crescimento institucional e intelectual de uma disciplina está ligado a um processo de institucionalização e profissionalização. Assim sendo, faz todo o sentido que uma disciplina atualmente tão preocupada com http://dx

show abstract

“…Analyses of the 'field' so far undertaken, such as Lessa ( , 2011, tend to highlight its diversity, without addressing its hierarchy. The few analyses that aim to rebuild systems of opposition, such as Keinert and Silva (2010), consider exogenous factors in determining the oppositions among groups, without analyzing the structure of production.Finally, meta disciplinary studies have evaluated the quality of production (REIS, 1997;SOARES, 2005), but little attention was paid to the parameters from which the quality is evaluated, assessing the discipline from a specific disciplinary view, using a specific property as a criterion for defining political science.This paper proposes an indicator to identify and measure the hierarchy of production.It shows the hierarchy of relevant categories of production in contemporary Brazilian political science analyzing its field of production, addressing several disciplinary views.1 For an overview of the evolution of theoretical and methodological guidelines since the 1970s, see Oliveira and Nicolau (2014). For an overview of the fields, see Martins and Lessa (2010).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, meta disciplinary studies have evaluated the quality of production (REIS, 1997;SOARES, 2005), but little attention was paid to the parameters from which the quality is evaluated, assessing the discipline from a specific disciplinary view, using a specific property as a criterion for defining political science. This paper proposes an indicator to identify and measure the hierarchy of production.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Stratification of Diversity: Measuring the Hierarchy of Brazilian Political Science

Leite

2016

Bras. Political Sci. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article proposes an indicator for measuring the hierarchy of academic production in Brazilian political science, based on Qualis, the impact factor and the share of articles on Political Science in selected journals. The dataset comprises 23 renowned national journals. Findings show that disciplinary traditions emphasizing institutional analysis as well as quantitative and nomothetic approaches, based on the proposition and testing of hypotheses and causal arguments predominate. This state of affairs, in turn, is explained by particular parameters for evaluating the academic production, that is, the institutionalization of a specific disciplinary view, a scientificpolitological one.Keywords: Brazilian political science; hierarchy of production; Qualis; disciplinary traditions; evaluation.igorous production about a discipline, particularly by its own initiative, is a sign of maturity. Recent literature on Brazilian political science shows the considerable degree of complexity and relative intellectual wealth achieved. Over the past 15 years, a myriad of areas, approaches and journals have arisen, ever more extensively since its conception as an autonomous discipline in the * http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/1981-38212016000100006 For replicating data, see bpsr.org.br/files/archives/Dataset_Leite. V The Stratification of Diversity: Measuring the Hierarchy of Brazilian Political Science(2016) 10 (1) e0006 -2/29 late 1960s 1 . The institutional development of the discipline run along this process, as shown by the growth of post-graduate courses and the establishment of objective criteria for evaluating academic institutions and research 2 . In this sense, the objectification of these criteria makes explicit certain stratification mechanisms that had previously remained more or less implicit, relying on subjective evaluation among peers. In other words, the growing maturity of the discipline allows for a clearer identification of the principles that, at the same time, differentiate and stratify it.However, this measurement of the discipline -its hierarchy -has not yet been systematically addressed in the literature. Analyses of the history of the discipline focus on the trajectory of themes, approaches and groups of political and social scientists in the constitution of the discipline, some favoring endogenous factors of the academic field, such as Quirino (1994), Almeida (2001), Peixoto (2001 and Marenco (2015), and others favoring exogenous factors, such as Arruda (2001) and Miceli (1990Miceli ( , 1993, as well as hybrid approaches such as Lamounier (1982), Trindade (2007, 2012) and Forjaz (1997. They answer to questions such as what are the theoretical and methodological influences of the discipline, what were the main groups that contributed to its formation, in which university environment they were formed and what political context influenced them. In all cases, the hierarchy of the discipline is more or less implicit in the transformations described and in the themes and approaches highlighted, but it is not ...

show abstract

As Ciências Sociais Nos Últimos 20 Anos: Três Perspectivas

Cited by 18 publications

References 0 publications

La autonomía reflexiva en el campo de la sociología (2000-2006)

La autonomía reflexiva en el campo de la sociología (2000-2006)

Tradições Intelectuais na Ciência Política Brasileira Contemporânea

The Stratification of Diversity: Measuring the Hierarchy of Brazilian Political Science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About