1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1999.00338.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ascochyta blight of chickpea in Australia: identification, pathogenicity and mating type

Abstract: The aetiology of blight of chickpea in South Australia was studied following sporadic disease outbreaks over several years that had been tentatively identified as Phoma blight. Nine fungal isolates from diseased chickpeas were tested for pathogenicity in the glasshouse, of which two caused symptoms resembling those of Ascochyta blight. The two aggressive isolates were identified as Ascochyta rabiei based on morphological characteristics of cultures and RAPD analysis. This was further confirmed by successful ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Labr., is an important disease of chickpea in many countries (India, Bangladesh, Algeria, Israel, Italy, Morocco, Nepal, Spain, Pakistan, Syria, Iran, USA, Australia and Canada) where cool and humid weather prevails during the flowering to podding stage [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. AB severely reduces the yield of chickpea and can cause complete yield losses under favorable conditions [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labr., is an important disease of chickpea in many countries (India, Bangladesh, Algeria, Israel, Italy, Morocco, Nepal, Spain, Pakistan, Syria, Iran, USA, Australia and Canada) where cool and humid weather prevails during the flowering to podding stage [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. AB severely reduces the yield of chickpea and can cause complete yield losses under favorable conditions [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, extensive losses from AB occurred in Australian commercial crops in 1998 and 1999 and retrospective seed testing found its presence in the country since 1992 (Galloway and MacLeod 2003a;Khan et al 1999). At that time all Australian chickpea cultivars were susceptible to A. rabiei Nasir et al 2000) and yield losses exceeded 50% with many crops completely destroyed (Kimber et al 2006a) leading to substantial economic losses (Lindbeck et al 2006).…”
Section: Chickpea Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While low numbers of ascospores have been reported from infested chickpea stubble (Galloway and MacLeod 2003a), all Australian isolates are of one mating type (Khan et al 1999;Phan et al 2003a) and limited molecular diversity has been found among the Australian population of A. rabiei (Gomez 2000;Phan et al 2003b). Current research suggests it is likely that multiple entries of the pathogen have occurred, perhaps from origins where a single mating type existed.…”
Section: Chickpea Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of resistant cultivars will also help to stabilize chickpea production. Breeding for resistance to ascochyta blight in chickpea has been limited by several factors, including the high pathogenic variability of the fungus and the limited sources of good resistance (Khan et al 1999;Singh and Reddy 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%