2012
DOI: 10.1193/1.4000072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASCONA: Automated Selection of COmpatible Natural Accelerograms

Abstract: This paper describes an automated procedure for selecting and scaling real spectrum-compatible records. The methodology allows one to choose from a predefined database, assembled from accredited strong-motion accelerometric data banks, real records satisfying properly defined seismological constraints with the additional requirement of spectrum-compatibility with a reference spectrum in a specified period range. Among the different sets of records satisfying these constraints, the user can specify the desired … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18], [19]), accelerograms are typically subdivided in three categories: real (or natural) records selected from accredited strongmotion databases, synthetic accelerograms generated through complex mathematical models of the seismic source and wave propagation phenomena, and artificial accelerograms generated by stochastic algorithms and constrained to be spectrum-compatible to a target response spectrum. Although the choice of the type of record to be used for defining the seismic input for time history analyses depends on the problem under study, in many cases real accelerograms are the best choice, since they are more realistic than spectrum-compatible artificial records and easier to obtain than synthetic seismograms generated from seismological source models.…”
Section: Selection Of Input Ground Motions For Time History Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[18], [19]), accelerograms are typically subdivided in three categories: real (or natural) records selected from accredited strongmotion databases, synthetic accelerograms generated through complex mathematical models of the seismic source and wave propagation phenomena, and artificial accelerograms generated by stochastic algorithms and constrained to be spectrum-compatible to a target response spectrum. Although the choice of the type of record to be used for defining the seismic input for time history analyses depends on the problem under study, in many cases real accelerograms are the best choice, since they are more realistic than spectrum-compatible artificial records and easier to obtain than synthetic seismograms generated from seismological source models.…”
Section: Selection Of Input Ground Motions For Time History Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, to satisfy spectrum-compatibility, records need to be linearly scaled to a predefined value, which can be the PGA or another selected ordinate of the target spectrum. It is important to emphasize however that the selected records also need to satisfy the requirement of "seismo-compatibility" which means that they must be consistent with the regional seismotectonic and seismogenic setting, as discussed for example in [19].…”
Section: Selection Of Input Ground Motions For Time History Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[6]), also due to the high computational effort and to objective difficulties related for example with the definition of seismic input in terms of appropriate acceleration time histories (e.g. [7], [8]) and the identification of appropriate damage limit states (e.g. [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%