2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-8368(99)00060-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of residual thermal stress/strain in particle reinforced metal matrix composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3). That the specific shape of low aspect ratio reinforcements does not significantly influence the elastic properties of composite materials has been shown explicitly in the literature both by analytical [61] and numerical models [62][63][64]. The yield stress of the present composites exhibits a strong dependence on reinforcement size, Fig.…”
Section: Young's Modulus and Yield Stresssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…3). That the specific shape of low aspect ratio reinforcements does not significantly influence the elastic properties of composite materials has been shown explicitly in the literature both by analytical [61] and numerical models [62][63][64]. The yield stress of the present composites exhibits a strong dependence on reinforcement size, Fig.…”
Section: Young's Modulus and Yield Stresssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The combined effects from: (i) thermal mismatch between the matrix (Mg) and the second phases (Cu/Mg 2 Cu); (ii) grain refinement; (iii) matrix work hardening/strain misfit due to the presence of second phase particulates; and (iv) non-basal slip system activation contribute to the mechanical properties enhancement, as reported elsewhere [40][41][42][43]. In addition, (v) the presence of harder Mg 2 Cu/Cu agglomerates and (vi) the efficiency of Mg 2 Cu/Cu in effective load transfer between Mg matrix [31], contribute to an appreciable improvement in strength properties.…”
Section: Influence Of Individual Nano-cu Additionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The material properties of the matrix were based on the commonly accepted values r 0 = 125 MPa, E = 71 GPa, E tan = 1.48 GPa from Refs. [12,13]. The values of cowper-symonds strain rate parameters (C = 6 500, P = 4) for alluminium alloy were taken form ANSYS/LS-DYNA manual [11].…”
Section: Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%