2015
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Cerebral Glucose Metabolism in Patients with Idiopathic Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder

Abstract: Correction to: Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism advance online publication, 29 July 2015; doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2015.173. Following the online publication of this article, the authors noted that the order of the appearance of affiliations and the information of the correspondence were placed incorrectly. The affiliations of the authors and the order of the correspondence have been reordered as follows: Jingjie Ge2,4, Ping Wu2,4, Shichun Peng3, Huan Yu1, Huiwei Zhang2, Yihui Guan2, David Eidelberg3, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
50
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
50
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, maps of the SPM t test revealed regional differences in mean values of normalized glucose metabolism. It has been shown consistently that the PCA approach has a higher sensitivity than SPM group comparisons for the detection of brain regions with metabolic changes in neurodegenerative disorders such as AD (23) and Parkinson disease (25) or in subjects with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (26,27). These data are further supported by the observation that the PES of the AD-related pattern had a higher accuracy in group discrimination than metabolic changes measured in regions of interest (23,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In contrast, maps of the SPM t test revealed regional differences in mean values of normalized glucose metabolism. It has been shown consistently that the PCA approach has a higher sensitivity than SPM group comparisons for the detection of brain regions with metabolic changes in neurodegenerative disorders such as AD (23) and Parkinson disease (25) or in subjects with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (26,27). These data are further supported by the observation that the PES of the AD-related pattern had a higher accuracy in group discrimination than metabolic changes measured in regions of interest (23,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…31 We extended this evidence by also highlighting positive covariance for metabolic levels in the insula, MTL, and anterior cingulate and thus further identifying similarities between the present results and the idiopathic RBD-related pattern. 44 Finally, the presence of CFL negatively covaried with bilateral occipital metabolism. CFL have been mainly associated with cholinergic deficit, which is also relevant in DLB and is also claimed to be involved in oscillations of electroencephalogram alpha rhythm frequency recorded over posterior scalp regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Images were reconstructed by means of a filtered back-projection method. As no blood samples were taken in these subjects according to our clinical imaging protocols we used PET images to measure relative glucose metabolism as described previously (Ge et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Pet Imaging and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we spatially normalized all 18 F-FDG PET images into a standard stereotactic Montreal Neurological Institute space using the default PET template in SPM and then smoothed the resulting PET scans with an isotropic three-dimensional Gaussian filter with a fullwidth at half-maximum of 10 mm. The relationships between metabolic images and behavioral measures were assessed according to brain mapping procedures we established previously (Liu et al, 2018;Ge et al, 2015;Zuo et al, 2013). In brief, the correlation between PET images and the mean Z-scores of each cognitive domain was analyzed separately, all with two variables (age and UPDRS-III scores) entered as covariates into the model to eliminate the interaction caused by these two factors.…”
Section: Pet Imaging and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation