2000
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620190439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing ecological risk in watersheds: A case study of problem formulation in the Big Darby Creek watershed, Ohio, USA

Abstract: Abstract-The Big Darby Creek watershed, a highly valued ecosystem in central Ohio, USA, threatened by intensive agriculture and suburban encroachment, served as an example of how case specifics can be applied to refine and direct the planning and problem formulation stage of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ecological risk assessment framework. Big Darby Creek was selected as one of five national pilot risk assessments designed to provide specific examples of how to perform an ecological risk assessm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impacts of urbanisation are mainly related to the direct effects of point sources of pollution. However, many other pressures are generated by urban areas, such as canalization, untreated storm-water and altered hydrological regimes (Cormier et al, 2000), and these cause both hydro-morphological and biological impacts (Paul & Meyer, 2001;Stepenuck, Crunkilton & Wang, 2002;Roy et al, 2003;Wang & Kanehl, 2003). When comparing the impacts of different forms of land cover, some authors found agriculture to be the most damaging activity, while others found the strongest negative correlations with urban areas.…”
Section: Hierarchy Of Impacts: Urbanization Vs Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impacts of urbanisation are mainly related to the direct effects of point sources of pollution. However, many other pressures are generated by urban areas, such as canalization, untreated storm-water and altered hydrological regimes (Cormier et al, 2000), and these cause both hydro-morphological and biological impacts (Paul & Meyer, 2001;Stepenuck, Crunkilton & Wang, 2002;Roy et al, 2003;Wang & Kanehl, 2003). When comparing the impacts of different forms of land cover, some authors found agriculture to be the most damaging activity, while others found the strongest negative correlations with urban areas.…”
Section: Hierarchy Of Impacts: Urbanization Vs Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1998, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officially promulgated an "Ecological Risk Assessment Guide" [7], which symbolizes that the ecological risk assessment has reached a mature stage. After that, a series of studies were conducted by many researchers on impacts of the ecological risk assessment framework and chemical toxic on the ecological risk [8,9]. Many scholars were focusing on in-depth studies of regional ecological risk at different spatial scales, such as lakes [10], river delta [11,12], and watershed basin [9,13,14] and different land use/cover types [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences highlight the importance of stratifying predictions into ecologically meaningful categories, rather than assuming generalized flow-ecology relationships and applying them to entire communities. This level of biological detail is particularly important in contexts where natural-resource managers are tasked with conserving habitat for specific species or groups of species, e.g., rare, native, and/or environmentally sensitive [20,53,68,69]. In such cases, single-species flow-ecology relationships might be useful (e.g., to predict abundance or probability of occurrence of individual species of conservation concern), and could be incorporated into the DSS framework in Figure 1.…”
Section: Meeting the Information Needs Of Water-resource Managersmentioning
confidence: 99%