2015
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Functional Mobility After Lower Limb Reconstruction

Abstract: The HMS shows satisfactory reliability and validity and may provide a platform to support adaptable, personalized rehabilitation and enhanced service evaluation to facilitate optimal patient outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in the early post-operative period have offered insight on patient mobility and functional recovery[ 59 ]. Cook et al[ 60 ] monitored patient steps after elective cardiac surgery.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in the early post-operative period have offered insight on patient mobility and functional recovery[ 59 ]. Cook et al[ 60 ] monitored patient steps after elective cardiac surgery.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, a decrease in right stride time (increase in speed of walking), step time asymmetry and amplitude asymmetry are important clinical features for observing recovery of the patients. [23,24] Kwasnicki et al [5] single -3D accelerometer worn on the ear (e-AR) -healthy subjects [12,22,23,24] -patients after hip or knee replacement surgery and patients with knee Osteoarthritis (OA) [24] -patients following lower limb trauma reconstruction [5] -treadmill walking [12,23,24] -walking in a corridor [5,22] -detection of gait asymmetry [22,24] -psychometric evaluation of a sensor-based mobility score called HMS [5] Bamberg et al [8] multiple -two dual axis accelerometer -three gyroscopes placed at the back of shoes -healthy subjects -PD patients -walking at self-selected natural Pace expressed "free gait" outside laboratory validation of GaitShoe system using healthy and PD patients Selles et al [13] multiple -two uniaxial accelerometers on the shank -healthy subjects -unilateral transtibial amputees -walking on straight track with a Kistler force platform validation of gait parameters using controls and transtibial amputees Turcot et al [14] multiple -two triaxial accelerometer -two triaxial gyroscope -asymptomatic subjects -patients with knee OA -walking on straight track with a Kistler force platform discrimination between asymptomatic subjects and medial knee OA patients Yoneyama et al [20,21] Sejdic et al [16] single -trunk mounted accelerometer -healthy subjects -PD patients [20,21] -PD and peripheral neuropathy patients [16] -walking on level ground [20,21] -treadmill walking [16] -accelerometry-based evaluation and assessment of daily gait characteristics [20,21] -comparison of accelerometer features between healthy subjects and patients groups [16]...…”
Section: Monitoring Patients With Lower Limb Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data was acquired for one of our previous studies already published in [5] for the purpose of psychometric evaluation of a sensorbased mobility score. Based on the protocol the patients performed a 6-Minute walk along the corridor, Timed Up & Go and Timed Up & down stairs.…”
Section: Monitoring Patients With Lower Limb Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations