2010
DOI: 10.1080/03643107.2010.512843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Knowledge Assets: Knowledge Audit of a Social Service Organization in Hong Kong

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This framework aimed to extract requirements knowledge and to assist semantic‐based understanding of knowledge sources in REP by using application domain and requirements ontology. However, this study did not consider KA as the beginning phase of KM to assess the existing knowledge in REP (Leung et al, ).…”
Section: Existing Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This framework aimed to extract requirements knowledge and to assist semantic‐based understanding of knowledge sources in REP by using application domain and requirements ontology. However, this study did not consider KA as the beginning phase of KM to assess the existing knowledge in REP (Leung et al, ).…”
Section: Existing Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To allay the above-mentioned challenges with respect to REP, significant care needs to be taken with the identification and assessment of knowledge (Taheri, Che Pa, Abdullah, & Abdullah, 2015). Because KA is the process of identification and assessment of knowledge, it is necessary to study KA in REP (Hylton, 2002;Leung et al, 2010;Liebowitz & Suen, 2000). Despite of many existing studies on KA, there has so far been little research into the nature and integration of KA in REP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of published literature shows that numerous studies have been conducted in the KA domain by researchers such as Liebowitz et al (2000), Burnett, Illingworth andWebster (2004), Perez-Soltero et al (2006), Jurinjak and Klicek (2008), Gourova, Antonova and Todorova (2009), Levy, Hadar and Aviv (2009), and Leung et al (2010). However, most of these studies only propose generic KA frameworks and provide high-level details on the phases or requirements of KA exercise (Mohd Drus & Shariff, 2011).…”
Section: According Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] In addition, 27 studies were excluded because their full text was not available to the authors. Eight studies were excluded because they explained the procedure for KAs rather than KMAs (either ''knowledge management audit'' or ''knowledge audit'' appeared in their titles).…”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%