2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the effects of vegetation types on carbon storage fifteen years after reforestation on a Chinese fir site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the initial C/N ratios for Pinus pinaster and Pinus nigra for other conifer species are higher than our results (Klemmedson, 1992;Joseâ Moro and Domingo 2000). The C and N distribution of the surface soil layer might reflect differences in the quality and quantity of litter fall inputs, litter decomposition dynamics, and the production and turnover of fine roots, which are the principal pathways for the return of C and N to the soil (Finzi et al, 1998;Wang et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2010). On the other hand, there are many factors which were mentioned in different sections of the manuscript and are mainly effective on soil C/N ratios such as biological activity, nitrogen use efficiency of vegetation and soil organisms, mineralization, leaching or fixation.…”
Section: C/n Ratiocontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…For instance, the initial C/N ratios for Pinus pinaster and Pinus nigra for other conifer species are higher than our results (Klemmedson, 1992;Joseâ Moro and Domingo 2000). The C and N distribution of the surface soil layer might reflect differences in the quality and quantity of litter fall inputs, litter decomposition dynamics, and the production and turnover of fine roots, which are the principal pathways for the return of C and N to the soil (Finzi et al, 1998;Wang et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2010). On the other hand, there are many factors which were mentioned in different sections of the manuscript and are mainly effective on soil C/N ratios such as biological activity, nitrogen use efficiency of vegetation and soil organisms, mineralization, leaching or fixation.…”
Section: C/n Ratiocontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Despite relatively low carbon input in the monocropping systems, the carbon conversion rate is much high. However, such link may actually reflect the close relationships of soil carbon sequestration with soil and/or climate conditions (Al-Kaisi and Grote, 2007;Wang et al, 2009). In addition, the high spatiotemporal heterogeneity of soil conditions such as soil texture is also largely influenced by climate conditions (Huang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Factors Regulating Soil Carbon Sequestrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C and N distribution of the surface soil layer might reflect differences in the quality and quantity of litterfall inputs, litter decomposition dynamics, and the production and turnover of fine roots, which are the principal pathways for the return of C and N to the soil (Finzi et al 1998;Wang et al 2009). Despite having different mechanisms affecting the C and N cycle from litterfall inputs and decomposition processes, the absence of any significant difference in the soil C and N status of the larch and pine plantations might be due to other factors such as fine roots, which are also a main source affecting soil C and N contents.…”
Section: And N Distribution In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%