2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the health effects associated with occupational radiation exposure in Korean radiation workers: protocol for a prospective cohort study

Abstract: IntroductionThe cancer risk of radiation exposure in the moderate-to-high dose range has been well established. However, the risk remains unclear at low-dose ranges with protracted low-dose rate exposure, which is typical of occupational exposure. Several epidemiological studies of Korean radiation workers have been conducted, but the data were analysed retrospectively in most cases. Moreover, groups with relatively high exposure, such as industrial radiographers, have been neglected. Therefore, we have launch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the size of our cohort was smaller than cohorts from other countries such as the United Kingdom, the United States, and France [43][44][45][46]. In order to increase the cohort size, enrollment will be continued at five-year intervals, and the development of a strategy to enroll retired workers is now in progress [10]. Lastly, the current occupational classification in the dose registry does not clearly reflect the occupational nature (e.g., profession).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Third, the size of our cohort was smaller than cohorts from other countries such as the United Kingdom, the United States, and France [43][44][45][46]. In order to increase the cohort size, enrollment will be continued at five-year intervals, and the development of a strategy to enroll retired workers is now in progress [10]. Lastly, the current occupational classification in the dose registry does not clearly reflect the occupational nature (e.g., profession).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, a younger cohort provides some advantages in terms of having fewer uncertainties about information collected such as dosimetry and baseline health status. For instance, older workers with long-term careers may have greater uncertainties about their radiation doses than recently hired workers, due to changes in personal dosimeter types (e.g., film badge or thermoluminescent dosimeters) over long employment periods and deficient or missing dose records (e.g., undocumented dose records) from before 1984, the year from when the national dose registry was available in Korea [10]. In addition, a younger cohort is assumed to be healthy; this is more appropriate for study subjects using a prospective cohort design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations