2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-019-04391-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the quality of mobile graphical user interfaces using multi-objective optimization

Abstract: Aesthetic defects are a violation of quality attributes that are symptoms of bad interface design programming decisions. They lead to deteriorating the perceived usability of mobile user interfaces and negatively impact the Users eXperience (UX) with the mobile app. Most existing studies relied on a subjective evaluation of aesthetic defects depending on end-users feedback, which makes the manual evaluation of mobile user interfaces human-centric, time-consuming, and error-prone. Therefore, recent studies have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, Ismail [ 23 ] discovered that unattractive interfaces confuse, obscure intent, and slow down users’ actions. Soui et al [ 24 ] emphasized that the interface design, apart from following the general rules, should be meaningful to the user. The aesthetics of user interfaces was widely discussed by Schlatter and Levinson [ 25 ], who reported that the interface as well as order and consistency of the grouping of elements has a significant influence on user perception.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Ismail [ 23 ] discovered that unattractive interfaces confuse, obscure intent, and slow down users’ actions. Soui et al [ 24 ] emphasized that the interface design, apart from following the general rules, should be meaningful to the user. The aesthetics of user interfaces was widely discussed by Schlatter and Levinson [ 25 ], who reported that the interface as well as order and consistency of the grouping of elements has a significant influence on user perception.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The saturated UI is overloaded MUI, when the user found that the interface is too dense, not easy to read and very tedious to understand [18]. This charged UI can reflect the troubles of synthesis and understandable for user because of the more density of MUI (Firmenich et al, 2018;[4, 19].…”
Section: Saturated Muimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the concept of visual complexity has been described, various studies have been carried out to measure this concept in predefined metric based manner [4][5][6]. Typically, there are studies in which the quality of the mobile UIs was measured by transforming it into a multi-objective optimization problem [7]. Lastly, UI evaluation with machine learning based methods is being conducted [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complexity analysis of visual interface and its understandability has long been the focus of attention of researchers. While in earlier studies [1][2][3], perceptual visual complexity had been tried to be defined based on perceptual attributes, in later studies, visual complexity of UIs has been measured by user evaluation with surveys, developing formal metrics and models [4][5][6], heuristics [7] to machine learning based [8] methods. Although formal metric and model based methods are mostly used, due the need of a blend of different metrics for different attributes and their potential complex interaction this problem is still not fully resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%