2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the service of water quality regulation by quantifying the effects of land use on water quality and public health in central Veracruz, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mexico's PHS program appears to be already moving in this direction, as it currently includes the possibility of supporting any ecosystem service (with the exception of carbon sequestration, which is covered under a new REDD+ program), even though to date most of the landowners enrolled continue to receive payments for hydrologic services (Muñoz-Piña et al 2011). An additional benefit of expanding the PHS program to include multiple services is the potential for attracting a broader range of donors, thereby potentially allowing for higher payments that more closely match opportunity costs in high deforestation risk areas (Mokondoko et al 2016). Lastly, PHS programs would greatly benefit from incorporating mechanisms for targeting enrollment and assigning payment amounts that integrate both socioeconomic and ecohydrologic criteria, including opportunity costs, hydrologic importance, deforestation risk, and multiple ecosystem services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mexico's PHS program appears to be already moving in this direction, as it currently includes the possibility of supporting any ecosystem service (with the exception of carbon sequestration, which is covered under a new REDD+ program), even though to date most of the landowners enrolled continue to receive payments for hydrologic services (Muñoz-Piña et al 2011). An additional benefit of expanding the PHS program to include multiple services is the potential for attracting a broader range of donors, thereby potentially allowing for higher payments that more closely match opportunity costs in high deforestation risk areas (Mokondoko et al 2016). Lastly, PHS programs would greatly benefit from incorporating mechanisms for targeting enrollment and assigning payment amounts that integrate both socioeconomic and ecohydrologic criteria, including opportunity costs, hydrologic importance, deforestation risk, and multiple ecosystem services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the modeling study by Quintero et al (2009), the PHS program was predicted to prevent a projected tripling of downstream sedimentation had those same lands under PHS enrollment been converted to agriculture, such that the estimated societal benefit from sediment reduction was greater than from increased dry-season flow. Mokondoko et al (2016), working in 10 catchments in the area of the Veracruz study, showed a significant positive relationship between forest cover within 100 m of streams, water quality (as measured by E. coli counts), and public health in neighboring communities (incidence of cholera and other gastrointestinal diseases reported in public health records). Estimating the mitigation and defensive costs associated with contaminated water, their study generated a conservative estimate of the value of cloud forest cover (US$90 ha -1 yr -1 ), on par with current levels of PHS in Mexico.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diseases linked with poor water quality such as cholera and some forms of diarrhoea, are contagious, and their costs affect the whole society (Sterner, 2003;Mokondoko et al, 2016;Tongesayi and Tongesayi, 2017), leading to higher health care costs.…”
Section: Increasing Human Health Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hal tersebut dapat mengakibatkan beragam gangguan kesehatan karena kualitas air tidak sesuai dengan peruntukannya bagi manusia, dan pada akhirnya juga berdampak terhadap penurunan kualitas air sungai (Effendi, 2003;Mokondoko et al, 2016;Pulford et al, 2017). Salah satu kegiatan yang berpotensi menurunkan kualitas air adalah usaha intensifikasi pertanian dengan tujuan untuk meningkatkan produksi pertanian secara cepat.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified