2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and modelling of uncertainty in precipitation forecasts from TIGGE using fuzzy probability and Bayesian theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mann-Kendall's mutation test is a simple non-parametric test, which defines a statistical sequence under the assumption of an independent random time sequence as follows (Cai, Wang, & Li, 2019):…”
Section: Mann-kendall Mutation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mann-Kendall's mutation test is a simple non-parametric test, which defines a statistical sequence under the assumption of an independent random time sequence as follows (Cai, Wang, & Li, 2019):…”
Section: Mann-kendall Mutation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hydrological modelling, the evaluation of the simulation uncertainty is a critical and meaningful step for an effective real-time forecasting [50,51]. Therefore, we suggest to select the three 2D-model maps indicated by our approach as the closest to the 1D-model map, and to evaluate the percent difference of some meaningful physical variables (i.e., the mean flood depth) between the "expected" 2D-model map and these three maps.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysis Of the Selected Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results indicated that the ECMWF and JMA forecasts performed best among all the predictions, and the postprocessed results improved the raw CMA forecasts significantly. Cai et al (2019) evaluated four control forecasts from TIGGE over the Shihe River basin during the flood season in the time period 2015-18. Their results showed that the JMA forecast performed best and the prediction performance of the UKMO and ECMWF forecasts were close to that of the JMA forecast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%