2015
DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2014.984656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment is learning: the preposition vanishes

Abstract: Scotland, in common with many countries internationally, has been learning how to align ideas from research with policy and practice. This article considers what Scotland learned from large-scale evaluations of its Assessment is for Learning (AifL) programme and the extent to which this evidence was used to inform future learning within the national programme. More recently, the policy focus in Scotland has shifted to the creation of a new curriculum, Curriculum for Excellence, subsuming AifL. Merging curricul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For us, it is striking that, in every jurisdiction in which we have worked with teachers on the development of formative assessment practice, teachers have said that the practices we are advocating cannot be used because they are under pressure to raise their students' test scores, and specifically, as a result, they have to 'teach to the test'. This is a particularly ironic finding given the evidence of the impact of formative assessment practices on student achievement on standardized tests (Wiliam et al, 2004;Kingston & Nash, 2011;2015). It is therefore, we believe, hard to see how further development of formative assessment can take place without clarifying the relationships between the formative and the summative aspects of teachers' work, whilst developing more nuanced understanding of the desirable, and indeed the possible, relationships between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For us, it is striking that, in every jurisdiction in which we have worked with teachers on the development of formative assessment practice, teachers have said that the practices we are advocating cannot be used because they are under pressure to raise their students' test scores, and specifically, as a result, they have to 'teach to the test'. This is a particularly ironic finding given the evidence of the impact of formative assessment practices on student achievement on standardized tests (Wiliam et al, 2004;Kingston & Nash, 2011;2015). It is therefore, we believe, hard to see how further development of formative assessment can take place without clarifying the relationships between the formative and the summative aspects of teachers' work, whilst developing more nuanced understanding of the desirable, and indeed the possible, relationships between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Particularly in Canada and Australia, the term "assessment as learning" (Hayward, 2015) has been used in a more specific sense; to describe the role of students in monitoring and directing their own learning (e.g., Earl, 2003;NSW BSTES, 2012). The term 'assessment for learning' is then used to describe the process by which teachers use assessment evidence to inform their teaching, and 'assessment of learning' refers to the use of assessment to determine the extent to which students have achieved intended learning outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of the new qualifications has not been unproblematic, in line with experience of previous qualifications reform in Scotland (Hayward, 2007(Hayward, , 2015Hayward & Hutchinson, 2013). reform of examinations is risky and systemic failures have been known to happen, such as in 2000 when the Highers were last reformed (Deloitte & Touche, 2000).…”
Section: Curriculum For Excellence Highersmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It may be all too easy to think that genuine collaboration across research and policy communities is just too difficult; however, the chapters illustrate many examples of the negative impact on education systems and ultimately on the learning of children and young people, and also of the effects of competing ideologies, and researchers, policymakers and practitioners working in tension with one another. If curriculum, assessment and pedagogy are to be brought into better alignment, then more effective collaboration is a necessary condition (Hayward, 2015).…”
Section: Curriculum Futures: Research Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%