2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.01.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of a hydraulic network model for zig–zag cooled power transformer windings

Abstract: The prediction of mass flow distribution is a first, though crucial, step in the thermal design of zig-zag cooled power transformer windings. Typically this prediction is based on thermo-hydraulic network models, which critically depend on the applied correlations. In this paper new correlations for flow through elbows and for dividing/merging flow in T-junctions are numerically extracted from dedicated CFD studies and applied to a case study. It is shown that the new correlations are superior for the predicti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the FluSHELL tool these temperature profiles are approximated by lumped coefficients: the friction coefficient, f , identified in Equation (4.9), represents the fluid velocity profile and the heat transfer coefficient, Therefore, FluSHELL accuracy is dependent on these coefficients and hence an adequate methodology to obtain such coefficients is paramount. This has been the main objective of recent works that used CFD to obtain improved friction and heat transfer correlations for the windings of typical core-type transformers (Campelo et al, 2012;Coddé et al, 2015;. In two of these works the authors conducted sets of CFD simulations in a theoretical T-Junction configuration in order to obtain improved correlations for the frictional losses and heat transfer coefficients .…”
Section: Flushell Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the FluSHELL tool these temperature profiles are approximated by lumped coefficients: the friction coefficient, f , identified in Equation (4.9), represents the fluid velocity profile and the heat transfer coefficient, Therefore, FluSHELL accuracy is dependent on these coefficients and hence an adequate methodology to obtain such coefficients is paramount. This has been the main objective of recent works that used CFD to obtain improved friction and heat transfer correlations for the windings of typical core-type transformers (Campelo et al, 2012;Coddé et al, 2015;. In two of these works the authors conducted sets of CFD simulations in a theoretical T-Junction configuration in order to obtain improved correlations for the frictional losses and heat transfer coefficients .…”
Section: Flushell Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFD simulations usually involve a much finer spatial discretization and enable the computation of the governing differential equations without 118 simplifications. However, its direct integration in the design-cycles is not envisaged in the mid-term (Cigre, 2016) and CFD is currently regarded as a virtual R&D laboratory used to extract relevant information to validate or to include in simpler modelling approaches (Campelo et al, 2012;Coddé et al, 2015;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, there has been a lot of research about cooling improvement in power transformers using mineral oil [21][22][23][24]. The reason is that hottest spot temperature inside windings of the oilimmersed power transformers is one of the main manifestations of the thermal stress which leads to aging and decomposition of both liquid and solid insulation material (oil and cellulose) more rapidly as compared with less heated spots [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is probably worth mentioning that the correlation equations proposed in [9] were partially verified by measuring the pressure drop over one pass of a test rig; however flow distributions obtained from the calibrated network model were significantly different from those obtained from 2D CFD simulations, especially for the cases of high oil flow rates [11]. The correlation equations for minor pressure losses of flow over elbows, in dividing, and merging T-junctions have been greatly improved in [10]. However, the discrepancy between flow distributions in a winding pass from a CFD simulation and a network model with the newly developed minor loss correlation equations is still not negligible (figure 8 in [10]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are usually obtained from literature pertaining to circular pipe flow and 2D duct heat transfer processes. The applicability of these traditional correlation equations proved to be unsatisfactory when compared with the performance of newly established correlation equations derived from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models [8][9][10]. It is probably worth mentioning that the correlation equations proposed in [9] were partially verified by measuring the pressure drop over one pass of a test rig; however flow distributions obtained from the calibrated network model were significantly different from those obtained from 2D CFD simulations, especially for the cases of high oil flow rates [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%