In high latitude planktonic ecosystems where the prymnesiophyte alga Phaeocystis pouchetii is often the dominant primary producer, its importance in structuring planktonic food webs is well known. In this study we investigated how the base of the planktonic food web responds to a P. pouchetii colony bloom in controlled mesocosm systems with natural water enclosed in situ in a West Norwegian fjord. Similar large (11 m 3 ) mesocosm studies were conducted in 2 successive years and the dynamics of various components of the planktonic food web from viruses to mesozooplankton investigated. In 2002 (4 to 24 March), 3 mesocosms comprising a control containing only fjord water; another with added nitrate (N) and phosphate (P) in Redfield ratios; and a third with added N, P, and cultured solitary cells of P. pouchetii, were monitored through a spring bloom cycle. In 2003 (27 February to 2 April) a similar set of mesocosms were established, but cultured P. pouchetii was not added. As expected, during both years, addition of N and P without addition of silicate resulted in an initial small diatom bloom followed by a colonial bloom of P. pouchetii (600 to 800 µg C l -1 ). However, the hypothesis that addition of solitary cells of P. pouchetii would enhance subsequent colony blooms was not supported. Interestingly, despite the large production of Phaeocystis colonial material, little if any was transferred to the grazing food web, as evidenced by non-significant effects on the biomass of micro-and mesozooplankton in fertilized mesocoms. Separate experiments utilizing material from the mesocosms showed that colonies formed from solitary cells at rates that required only ca. 1% conversion efficiencies. The results are discussed from the perspective of future research still required to understand the impact of life cycle changes of this enigmatic phytoplankter on surrounding ecosystems.
KEY WORDS: Phaeocystis pouchetii · Mesocosms · Nutrients · Fjord · Biocomplexity
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 321: 2006 gelatinous polysaccharide 'skin' (Chen et al. 2002). Solitary cells may be either motile or non-motile, and are typically 3 to 9 µm in diameter (Rousseau et al. 1994). This unusually large range of sizes between colonies and solitary cells (ca. 6 to 11 orders of magnitude in biovolume) can significantly alter material flow among trophic levels and export from the upper ocean (Wassmann et al. 1990, Lancelot et al. 1998. Furthermore, each stage is thought to function in different ways in order to reduce losses to either small or large zooplankton and viruses, and thus Phaeocystis spp. effectively function as dual species (Weisse et al. 1994, Smaal & Twisk 1997, Hamm et al. 1999, Jacobsen 2000, Verity 2000, Jakobsen & Tang 2002, Tang 2003.The dual life history of colonial and solitary cell stages was described over 50 yr ago (Kornmann 1955), and the dominant morphology appears to alter the ecosystem function from a regenerative system (solitary cells) ...