2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9030226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Canopy Chlorophyll Content Retrieval in Maize and Soybean: Implications of Hysteresis on the Development of Generic Algorithms

Abstract: Canopy chlorophyll content (Chl) closely relates to plant photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen status and productivity. The goal of this study is to develop remote sensing techniques for accurate estimation of canopy Chl during the entire growing season without re-parameterization of algorithms for two contrasting crop species, maize and soybean. These two crops represent different biochemical mechanisms of photosynthesis, leaf structure and canopy architecture. The relationships between canopy Chl and reflectanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
64
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
6
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of MTCI also has limitations because we have assumed that the trend of MTCI is linear and the V cmax, 25 , chlorophyll content and MTCI share the same trend. Although the correlations between V cmax, 25 and chlorophyll content (Croft et al, ; Houborg et al, ) and between chlorophyll content and MTCI (Nguy‐Robertson et al, ; Peng et al, ) are strong, more studies that directly use of MTCI for GPP modeling, such as Alton (), Boyd et al (), Dong et al (), Harris & Dash (), and Loozen et al (), will further strengthen the conclusion of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The use of MTCI also has limitations because we have assumed that the trend of MTCI is linear and the V cmax, 25 , chlorophyll content and MTCI share the same trend. Although the correlations between V cmax, 25 and chlorophyll content (Croft et al, ; Houborg et al, ) and between chlorophyll content and MTCI (Nguy‐Robertson et al, ; Peng et al, ) are strong, more studies that directly use of MTCI for GPP modeling, such as Alton (), Boyd et al (), Dong et al (), Harris & Dash (), and Loozen et al (), will further strengthen the conclusion of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The consistent outperformance of MTCI compared to other VIs for both the B-K sub-region and the 1AF region is likely due in part to its greater sensitivity to canopy chlorophyll content [15,24]. Potentially more important is the fact that MTCI is much less affected by atmospheric conditions because its calculation is based on the difference in reflectance between two nearby bands that will be similarly affected by atmospheric scattering [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This noise source would most likely increase as the growing season progressed as tassel, ear, and stem surface areas become larger components of the canopy "total foliage" area index. In addition, the visual separation of canopy leaf area into green and non-green classes is inherently subjective and, thus, it is likely an additional noise source in the relationships developed from the data sets [25,26]. Further details on the quantification of green leaf area index at the study sites are in [27].…”
Section: Leaf Area Index Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%