1986
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.143.8.1024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of depression in childhood and adolescence: an evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC)

Abstract: Psychometric characteristics of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC) were evaluated with 148 child and adolescent psychiatric inpatients. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and concurrent validity were adequate. Principal components analysis identified three distinct factors: behavioral and cognitive components of depression and a happiness dimension. However, subsequent factor scores and CES-DC total scores were unable to discriminate DSM-III diagnoses, inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
130
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 513 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These included gender, race/ethnicity, parental education, employment, family income (divided into four quartiles), an indicator for whether adolescents reported poor relationships with both parents (based on a four-item scale measuring the quality of the relationships with either parent), and depression measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC; Weissman et al, 1980). The CES-DC has demonstrated good reliability and validity in adolescent samples (Faulstich et al, 1986; Fendrich et al, 1990; Phillips et al, 2006). In addition, peer alcohol use was measured with the item “Of your 3 best friends, how many drink alcohol at least once a month?” Parental alcohol problems were identified using primary caregivers’ responses to questions about whether adolescents’ biological mothers or biological fathers had alcohol problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included gender, race/ethnicity, parental education, employment, family income (divided into four quartiles), an indicator for whether adolescents reported poor relationships with both parents (based on a four-item scale measuring the quality of the relationships with either parent), and depression measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC; Weissman et al, 1980). The CES-DC has demonstrated good reliability and validity in adolescent samples (Faulstich et al, 1986; Fendrich et al, 1990; Phillips et al, 2006). In addition, peer alcohol use was measured with the item “Of your 3 best friends, how many drink alcohol at least once a month?” Parental alcohol problems were identified using primary caregivers’ responses to questions about whether adolescents’ biological mothers or biological fathers had alcohol problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-DC) designed for children aged 6 to 17 years was used to measure depression [19,20]. This scale was translated into the local languages for use by the researchers, and then was back-translated and field-tested to ensure proper readability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The respondents were asked to rate the degree to which they experienced each depression related symptom on a 4-point frequency scale (not at all, a little, some, and a lot), and the possible scores for CES-DC ranged from 0 to 60. A CES‒DC score of 15 or higher has previously been considered suggestive of significant level of depressive symptoms in children and adolescents [19,20]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Youth and their caregivers reported on the following measures of youth mental health: Depression: An adapted 30-item scale [48] of which 20 comprised core items from the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CESDC) [49] with 10 additional items added from local qualitative data. Scoring was 0 (never) to 3 (often) (α = 0.95).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%