2022
DOI: 10.30958/aje.10-2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Distance Learning Practices during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Grades K-12

Abstract: This study aims to examine the distance learning practices carried out at the primary education level during the COVID-19 pandemic from students’ and their parents' perspectives. The study was conducted with 76 primary school students at different grade levels, including their parents (76), in the state schools of Giresun city in the spring semester of the 2019-2020 academic year. The study was based on the case study method, one of the qualitative research designs. An information collection form with open-end… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional assessment methods, primarily paper-based, are familiar to educators (Montgomery, 2002), however, these methods are characterized by rigid question formats, offer a limited snapshot of an individual's capabilities often sidelining multifaced learning perspectives (Frey & Schmitt, 2010), and do not cater to students' unique knowledge, skills, and experiences and evaluate competencies typically beyond computerization (Swiecki et al, 2022). While teachers have incorporated technology to support conventional assessment practices (Grion et al, 2018) and have adapted their pedagogical and evaluative strategies during exigencies (Legvart et al, 2022;Turan-Güntepe et al, 2023), AI's advent in grading introduces novel dimension. AI's inherent nuances necessitate educators' cognizance during evaluation, transcending mere performance measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional assessment methods, primarily paper-based, are familiar to educators (Montgomery, 2002), however, these methods are characterized by rigid question formats, offer a limited snapshot of an individual's capabilities often sidelining multifaced learning perspectives (Frey & Schmitt, 2010), and do not cater to students' unique knowledge, skills, and experiences and evaluate competencies typically beyond computerization (Swiecki et al, 2022). While teachers have incorporated technology to support conventional assessment practices (Grion et al, 2018) and have adapted their pedagogical and evaluative strategies during exigencies (Legvart et al, 2022;Turan-Güntepe et al, 2023), AI's advent in grading introduces novel dimension. AI's inherent nuances necessitate educators' cognizance during evaluation, transcending mere performance measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%