2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3917-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of dual-probe Her-2 fluorescent in situ hybridization in breast cancer by the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines produces more equivocal results than that by the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines

Abstract: Dual-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (D-FISH) is a widely accepted method to determine the gene amplification status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her-2). In 2013, the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) updated the guidelines on the Her-2 testing for invasive breast cancer (BCa). The interpretation criteria for D-FISH changed accordingly. In this study, we compared the Her-2 FISH statuses based on the 2013 and 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines in 19… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For IHC this may be due to its semi-quantitative nature and non-standardized methods. FISH is thought by some to provide a more accurate assessment for HER2 status [ 7 , 8 ] since a chromosome count can be done, but the weakness of this method is that it does not necessarily reflect target protein expression [ 9 , 10 ] and counting FISH spots is tedious and biased by tumor heterogeneity [ 11 ]. Historically, slide-based measurements of mRNA have been tested, including using several commercially available platforms [ 12 14 ], but have not gained broad acceptance for assessment of HER2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For IHC this may be due to its semi-quantitative nature and non-standardized methods. FISH is thought by some to provide a more accurate assessment for HER2 status [ 7 , 8 ] since a chromosome count can be done, but the weakness of this method is that it does not necessarily reflect target protein expression [ 9 , 10 ] and counting FISH spots is tedious and biased by tumor heterogeneity [ 11 ]. Historically, slide-based measurements of mRNA have been tested, including using several commercially available platforms [ 12 14 ], but have not gained broad acceptance for assessment of HER2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IHC was performed to detect the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) in BC tissues taken from patients included in the current study. The expression of Her-2 was measured based on the Recommendations for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in BC ( 20 ). Tissues were sent to the pathology department ≤30 min following collection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TNBC samples were collected from consecutive breast cancer cases from January 2014 to February 2014, as described in our previous study [ 35 ]. The immunohistochemistry experiment was conduced in December 2014.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%