2010
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ww.1943-5460.0000053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Flocculation Kinetics of Cohesive Sediments from the Seine and Gironde Estuaries, France, through Laboratory and Field Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
14
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in Manning and Schoellhamer (), the settling velocities of suspended flocs in San Francisco Bay are not shown to be a strong function of the floc size, for the sake of simplicity, we refer to the suspended sediment of the first size class as microflocs and the second class as macroflocs. This is consistent with the observation that the small microflocs generally settle at less than 1 mm s −1 , while macroflocs settle at 115 mm s −1 (Mikeš & Manning, ). it is possible to model flocculation and breakup in suspension by including source terms on the right‐hand side of equation to account for transfer of sediment mass between different floc size classes with the population balance approach (Lick et al, ; Sterling et al, ).…”
Section: Modeling Sediment Transport In San Francisco Baysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although in Manning and Schoellhamer (), the settling velocities of suspended flocs in San Francisco Bay are not shown to be a strong function of the floc size, for the sake of simplicity, we refer to the suspended sediment of the first size class as microflocs and the second class as macroflocs. This is consistent with the observation that the small microflocs generally settle at less than 1 mm s −1 , while macroflocs settle at 115 mm s −1 (Mikeš & Manning, ). it is possible to model flocculation and breakup in suspension by including source terms on the right‐hand side of equation to account for transfer of sediment mass between different floc size classes with the population balance approach (Lick et al, ; Sterling et al, ).…”
Section: Modeling Sediment Transport In San Francisco Baysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In such environments, conceptual models such as the ones proposed by Dyer () or Droppo (), argue that the aggregated size is mostly controlled by particle concentration, flow shear stress or both. These models are supported by numerous field (Mikeš and Manning, ) and laboratory (Stone and Krishnappan, ; Stone et al ., ) observations. They suggest that while soil particle physical, chemical and biological characteristics will have an effect on aggregate structure, both at detachment and within riverine flow (Walling and Moorehead, ; Ankers et al ., ), the down‐river particle characteristics within the flow will ultimately be determined by in‐channel hydrodynamic processes acting upon the particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Turbulent mixing influences collisions, and therefore the potential for growth, but increases in G also lead to increased stress on the flocs and increases in breakup and erosion rates. Therefore, larger values of G lead to smaller equilibrium floc sizes in both the laboratory [e.g., Mietta et al ., ; Mikeš and Manning , ; Verney et al ., ] and field [e.g., Safak et al ., ; Ramírez‐Mendoza et al ., ], with d fe typically being ηk [ Tambo and Hozumi , ; Akers et al ., ; van Leussen , ; Verney et al ., ; Kumar et al ., ]. G can also influence floc density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%