2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12166593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Groundwater Recharge in Agro-Urban Watersheds Using Integrated SWAT-MODFLOW Model

Abstract: Numerical models are employed widely to evaluate the hydrological components of a watershed but, traditionally, watershed models simplify either surface or subsurface flow module. In this setup, as a bridge between groundwater and surface water regimes, aquifer recharge is the most affected segment of the water balance. Since the watershed processes are increasingly changed, the need for a comprehensive model with detailed conceptualizing capacity of both groundwater and surface water flow systems is growing. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the state of art, several methods have been developed for estimating aquifer recharge rates. These methods include empirical [15][16][17], physical [15,18,19], and chemical methods [12,[20][21][22], as well as hydrogeological modeling [17,[23][24][25][26][27]. Since each method carries its own uncertainties, some authors [17,18,28,29] have recommended a combination of several methods to estimate a robust range for the amount of groundwater recharge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the state of art, several methods have been developed for estimating aquifer recharge rates. These methods include empirical [15][16][17], physical [15,18,19], and chemical methods [12,[20][21][22], as well as hydrogeological modeling [17,[23][24][25][26][27]. Since each method carries its own uncertainties, some authors [17,18,28,29] have recommended a combination of several methods to estimate a robust range for the amount of groundwater recharge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the discussion about the limitation of the model SWAT-MODFLOW, the results obtained by Araujo [42] indicate that the model's recharge estimations are more reliable. In this model, the simulation of surface and groundwater flows are integrated, exploring the strengths from each original model-SWAT simulating surface water flow and MODFLOW simulating groundwater flow-thus making the global modelling more robust to represent every flow in the hydrographic basin [55]. Using the integrated model, Araujo [42] compared simulated flow rates with measured flow rates, obtaining satisfactory results for the performance indexes, which indicate SWAT-MODFLOW model's ability to represent the hydrological processes in a Cerrado environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study seeks to fill this gap by using the SWAT model to estimate recharge and coupling it loosely with the MODFLOW model to determine the effect of groundwater recharge and abstraction on groundwater levels. The SWAT model has been used to estimate groundwater recharge in various places, such as BJC Australia, where it provided an alternative to point scale modeling and spatial recharge distribution [19]; India in the lower Chenab canal [20]; Ghana in the Volta river basin, annual recharge was estimated to be 8% of the annual rainfall [21]; central Kuwait [19,22] and Australia [23]. The model has proved to be reliable and handy in the estimation of groundwater recharge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%