“…Radar data cannot yet be used independently for estimating aboveground biomass and serve as supplementary data for optical data [ 79 , 90 , 95 , 97 , 117 ]; - Sentinel-2 performs better than Landsat in mapping primary variables and attributes associated with biomass in forest stands [ 77 , 91 , 106 , 119 , 120 , 121 ];
- Spatial resolution is crucial for biomass estimation [ 56 , 76 , 91 , 95 ];
- The texture and extent of land-cover classes increase the accuracy of biomass estimation. They are useful only as supplementary data [ 79 , 81 , 83 ];
- In general, very-high-resolution satellite data are highly useful for habitat mapping [ 111 , 112 ];
- The best modeling algorithms are XG-Boost, random forest, and artificial neural network [ 83 , 91 , 92 , 95 , 96 ].
…”