2017
DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_176_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of regeneration of bone in the extracted third molar sockets augmented using xenograft (CollaPlugTN Zimmer) in comparison with the normal healing on the contralateral side

Abstract: Introduction:Alveolar bone resorption is a significant clinical problem. Bone loss in third molar region following extraction or surgical removal not only leads to periodontal problems in second molar region but also it may lead to some serious problems like increased incidence of angle fractures. In order to reduce the risks following third molar surgery, the socket should be augmented with bone grafts. In recent days guided tissue regeneration is the most accepted and successful technique followed many autho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the absence of a membrane could be problematic [ 99 , 103 ]. Famili et al studied 20 extraction sockets in a sample of six persons [ 75 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the absence of a membrane could be problematic [ 99 , 103 ]. Famili et al studied 20 extraction sockets in a sample of six persons [ 75 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a CT scan investigation, studied the physiological phenomenon of post-extraction alveolar bone resorption and compared it with fresh extraction sites treated with a xenograft (Bio-Oss ® ) covered with a coronally advanced flap. They reported that this technique of SA provided a significant benefit in maintaining the original bone volume in treated sites [ 67 ]. Nevertheless, the histologic data showed that the residual graft conversion process was slow and was still ongoing even after 7 months, with this choice of biomaterial demonstrating again that xenografts are thoroughly a scaffold material with very slow turnover properties.…”
Section: Indications For Socket Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the basis for the production of available barrier materials (Geistlich Bio-Gide, Geistlich, Wolhusen, Switzerland), biomaterials for bone augmentation (Geistlich Bio-Oss ® Collagen, Geistlich, Wolhusen, Switzerland), hemostatic sponges used postoperatively, i.e., CollaPlug ® , CollaCote ® , and CollaTape-zimmer biomet, as well as carriers that release the substance topically i.e., PerioCol™-CG [ 114 , 115 , 116 ]. Based on collagen, resorbable barrier materials are obtained to avoid re-operation to remove non-resorbable membranes in GTR/GBR procedures.…”
Section: Carriers and Biodegradable Polymeric Materials In Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical studies, the effects of the carrier were compared at 3 and 6 months after scaling root planing (SRP) and the simultaneous administration of the carrier into 20 periodontal pockets with a control group of patients where only SRP was applied. A statistically significant reduction in the BoP rate and improvement in the clinical location of the connective tissue attachment (CAL) were observed in the study group where a carrier was applied in addition to SRP [ 114 ].…”
Section: Carriers and Biodegradable Polymeric Materials In Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 99%