2016
DOI: 10.5455/ijmsph.2016.16052016517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of risk of type 2 diabetes using simplified Indian Diabetes Risk Score - Community-based cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
10
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar study conducted by Brahmbhatt et al in urban area of south India reported 34% of the population were found in high risk category which is also lower than this study. 5 In another study done by Nandeshwar et al in Bhopal city, 68.8% of the population were in high risk category which is more than this study. 7 This risk difference may be due to variance in life-styles of the population and also an indicator to know that if risk factors are not reversed then one is likely to get diabetes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a similar study conducted by Brahmbhatt et al in urban area of south India reported 34% of the population were found in high risk category which is also lower than this study. 5 In another study done by Nandeshwar et al in Bhopal city, 68.8% of the population were in high risk category which is more than this study. 7 This risk difference may be due to variance in life-styles of the population and also an indicator to know that if risk factors are not reversed then one is likely to get diabetes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…According to a cross sectional study by Brahmbatt et al the prevalence of at risk subjects for diabetes was 34% in urban area of Mangalore. 5 Sample size was calculated as:…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In a study done by Krutharth et al in urban Mangalore, Karnataka, the differences between gender and IDRS components like waist circumference and physical activity was found to be statistically significant. 9 However, in our study we observed that there was statistically significant difference between gender and family history of diabetes component of IDRS (p=0.001) but not with other components like age, waist circumference and physical activity. In a study conducted by Gupta et al in urban Pondicherry, it was found that 6.4% of individuals who were underweight had high IDRS score whereas this proportion was 44.5% among obese individuals.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Result of this study is similar to the present study. [9] Gokhale et al studied 184 patients attending diabetic OPD of Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Pimpri, Pune. The mean WC of this study is 94.76 cm which is more than our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables predict diabetes mellitus with optimum sensitivity and specificity and have high positive and negative predictive value. [9,10] The waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), and waist-hip ratio (WHR) are three parameters to evaluate body fat and fat repartition in adults. Some authors showed that BMI and WHR were predictor of Type 2 diabetes outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%