2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of sustainable energy potential of non-plantation biomass resources in the Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature is replete with many attempts to estimate global and national production and use of residues, but with large variations. These include residues availability in the Philippines (Elauria et al, 2005), India (Reddy, 1994), Karnataka (Ramachandra et al, 2004), and selected Asian countries (Bhattacharya et al, 1999. Other related reports include Akinbami (2001), Akdeniz et al (2004), Jekayinfa andOmisakin (2005), andEl.…”
Section: Problem and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Literature is replete with many attempts to estimate global and national production and use of residues, but with large variations. These include residues availability in the Philippines (Elauria et al, 2005), India (Reddy, 1994), Karnataka (Ramachandra et al, 2004), and selected Asian countries (Bhattacharya et al, 1999. Other related reports include Akinbami (2001), Akdeniz et al (2004), Jekayinfa andOmisakin (2005), andEl.…”
Section: Problem and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…According to the annual food statistics report for 2007 to 2010 (Agriculture and Food Agency, 2010), the annual planted area of rice and production paddies averaged 252,944 ha and 1,462,453 tons/y in Taiwan, respectively, during this period. The R SP value ranged from 1.0 to 4.3 depending on the rice variety (Elauria et al, 1999). For the most frequently planted varieties, the value of 1.11, as suggested by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), was used.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Air Pollutant Emissions From Rsobmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field measurements showed that the average fresh cattle manure production was 19 kg head-1 day-1, and its recoverable fraction was 0.8. The recoverable fraction was high compared to the literature for other countries, such as 0.6 for China and India [17], [18], 0.8 for Thailand [19] and 0.5 for the Philippines [20]. The higher value is because Afghanistan does not have grazing areas for cow feeding, so they are always farmed in selected small areas, making it easier to collect the manure also for the purpose of using it in the form of fertilizer.…”
Section: Cattle Manure Energy Potentialmentioning
confidence: 75%