1997
DOI: 10.1007/s004360050227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the viability of Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula by comparative uptake of various vital dyes

Abstract: Of various vital dyes used to assess schistosomula viability, toluidine blue enabled differential counting of the schistosomula on microscope slides but not in culture wells, whereas methylene blue could be added directly to the schistosomula suspension in culture wells of microtiter plates. Toluidine blue uptake by dead parasites was very fast. It mostly also partially stained damaged but not dead organisms. Its main disadvantage was rapid, nonspecific staining of live schistosomula, requiring prompt counting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, according to the literature, using the propidium iodide staining methods to differentiate dead and viable eggs has been evidenced by such limitations in the viability tests for the other parasites such as Trichuris muris eggs (failure to identify nonviable eggs, Kopper and Mansfield 2010) and Cryptosporidium andersoni oocysts (dependence to the storage medium, Kváč et al 2007). Also, Gold (1997) compared the uptake of two vital dyes, toluidine blue and methylene blue, for the assessment of the viability of Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula. That study proved that the main disadvantage of toluidine blue was rapid, nonspecific staining of live schistosomula, whereas methylene blue did not always stain flattened, dead schistosomula or it stained them an uncontrasting pale blue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, according to the literature, using the propidium iodide staining methods to differentiate dead and viable eggs has been evidenced by such limitations in the viability tests for the other parasites such as Trichuris muris eggs (failure to identify nonviable eggs, Kopper and Mansfield 2010) and Cryptosporidium andersoni oocysts (dependence to the storage medium, Kváč et al 2007). Also, Gold (1997) compared the uptake of two vital dyes, toluidine blue and methylene blue, for the assessment of the viability of Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula. That study proved that the main disadvantage of toluidine blue was rapid, nonspecific staining of live schistosomula, whereas methylene blue did not always stain flattened, dead schistosomula or it stained them an uncontrasting pale blue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 1, many of the knocked down genes presented the general phenotype of reduced motility, while the activity of enzymes, demonstrated by biochemical assays, were also reduced. Further characterization of the tegument integrity could have involved the exclusion of vital dyes [43] or ultrastructural analysis, which would have provided information on a complex and important region of the parasite [44][45][46]. This latter approach has been used to demonstrate the involvement of tetraspanins in maintaining tegument fidelity [47].…”
Section: Rnai As a Tool To Investigate Schistosome Biologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Over the past many years, the conventional Trypan Blue has been used for assessing cell viability of various parasites and cells as well (Gold 1997;Wiehart et al 2006;Jin et al 2009;Tan et al 2010). MF has been used widely on malaria (Field 1940;Fenton and Innes 1945;Reilly et al 1997), filaria (Sivanandam and Mak 1975), Leishmania (Chunge et al 1989), Acanthamoeba spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%