2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.endinu.2019.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of two glycated hemoglobin immunoassays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, affinity methods have already been suggested as an acceptable and more useful method for reflecting glycemic control because they mainly measure glycohemoglobin regardless of the glycation site and hence may be clinically more accurate [ 15 ]. Studies have shown that results from the HbA1c immunoassays were also comparable to those from HPLC assays, showing good correlation, appropriate precision, and low bias [ 20 ]. Immunoassays utilizing various antibodies raised against specific epitopes of hemoglobin, for example, the Amadori product of glucose plus the first eight amino acids on the N-terminal end of the beta chain of hemoglobin, and many more, have shown good correlation with established methods for estimating glycohemoglobin [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, affinity methods have already been suggested as an acceptable and more useful method for reflecting glycemic control because they mainly measure glycohemoglobin regardless of the glycation site and hence may be clinically more accurate [ 15 ]. Studies have shown that results from the HbA1c immunoassays were also comparable to those from HPLC assays, showing good correlation, appropriate precision, and low bias [ 20 ]. Immunoassays utilizing various antibodies raised against specific epitopes of hemoglobin, for example, the Amadori product of glucose plus the first eight amino acids on the N-terminal end of the beta chain of hemoglobin, and many more, have shown good correlation with established methods for estimating glycohemoglobin [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 38 We used capillary blood samples and equipment to conduct point-of-care immunoassay (DCA Vantage Analyzer, Siemens) which has shown sufficient correlation with the reference method, high-performance liquid chromatography. 39 The method of analysis is calibrated against International Federation of Clinical Chemists standard. The same equipment was used at each measurement time point and a checklist for calibration and maintenance was followed in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%