2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asset pricing during pandemic lockdown

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that various patterns of stock price dynamics are realized according to the tightness of lockdown. As discussed in Section 4 , our model yields a negative relationship between asset price change and the tightness of lockdown, and this is consistent with the findings of recent empirical studies in the area, including Saito and Sakamoto ( 2021 ) and Scherf et al ( 2022 ). We also find that enforcing lockdown improves the welfare of both capitalists and sector A workers, but not necessarily sector B workers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We show that various patterns of stock price dynamics are realized according to the tightness of lockdown. As discussed in Section 4 , our model yields a negative relationship between asset price change and the tightness of lockdown, and this is consistent with the findings of recent empirical studies in the area, including Saito and Sakamoto ( 2021 ) and Scherf et al ( 2022 ). We also find that enforcing lockdown improves the welfare of both capitalists and sector A workers, but not necessarily sector B workers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Here, we refer to an empirical implication of Proposition 4 . Using data from advanced countries, Saito and Sakamoto ( 2021 ) and Scherf et al ( 2022 ) report a negative relationship between the strictness of lockdown policy and asset price changes: the tighter the lockdown policy is, the lower the (average) stock prices become. Using the result for the average stock price change in Proposition 4 , our model explains this relation in light of the ambiguity aversion of asset holders.…”
Section: A Model With Lockdownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to popular belief, after the COVID-19 pandemic-induced economic catastrophe, stock markets worldwide recovered even above their prior highs 16 despite stringent lockdown conditions. 17 Contemporary financial researchers attribute the causes of divergence between two markets to three elements [18][19][20] :…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to popular belief, after the COVID-19 pandemic-induced economic catastrophe, stock markets worldwide recovered even above their prior highs 16 despite stringent lockdown conditions. 17 Contemporary financial researchers attribute the causes of divergence between two markets to three elements 1820 : asset markets are forward-looking, and thus high prices may simply reflect investors’ expectations of a quick end to the pandemic; the large companies represented in the major stock indices are immune to pandemic effects or may even benefit from them (e.g., Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Consumer goods); central bank intervention lending support to asset values. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saito and Sakamoto [ 7 ] study the effect of lockdown policies on asset prices. In the model, lockdown policies reduce precautionary savings by decreasing susceptible agents’ probability of getting infected in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%