2019
DOI: 10.1134/s1022795419120093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of C3435T (rs1045642) Polymorphism of the MDR1 Gene with the Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Russian Females from Central Russia

Abstract: The objective of this study was to examine associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms, rs1045642 within the MDR1 gene and rs1799930 within the NAT2 gene, with the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the population of Central Russia. DNA specimens were obtained from 178 patients with CRC (87 males and 91 females) and 327 age-matched healthy controls (179 males and 148 females). Genotyping was performed using real-time PCR. Association of the studied SNPs with the risk of CRC was evaluated using logistic reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Histological types of colorectal cancer in the case group included well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (70.3% of cases), moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (21.6% of cases), and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (8.1% of cases). The control group was recruited from the same population and included healthy blood volunteers and hospital-based patients with no clinical evidence for CRC, as described previously [22,23]. The criterion for inclusion in the control group was the absence of oncological and other chronic diseases.…”
Section: Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological types of colorectal cancer in the case group included well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (70.3% of cases), moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (21.6% of cases), and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (8.1% of cases). The control group was recruited from the same population and included healthy blood volunteers and hospital-based patients with no clinical evidence for CRC, as described previously [22,23]. The criterion for inclusion in the control group was the absence of oncological and other chronic diseases.…”
Section: Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of CRC was veri ed by experienced oncologists based on the results of clinical, laboratory, and instrumental methods. The control group was recruited from the same population and included healthy blood volunteers and hospital-based patients with no clinical evidence for CRC, as described previously [22,23]. The criterion for inclusion in the control group was the absence of oncological and other chronic diseases.…”
Section: Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 777 unrelated Russian individuals from the Kursk region was examined; written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to entering the study. The study included 241 CRC patients (129 males and 112 females) who underwent inpatient treatment at the Kursk Regional Clinical Oncology Center between 2013 and 2017 [6,7]. The control group included 536 healthy volunteers (246 males and 290 females) without a history of chronic diseases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%