“…Inoralsquamouscellcarcinoma,mostofthecon-ductedstudiesfocusedonTILsspecificsub-types,in the majority of cases using immunohistochemistry, but in a minority of studies supported by flow-cytometry [28] and their association with the most important clinical factors -patient's survivals. Stasikowska-Kanickaet alstudiedCD4,CD8,FOXP3, PD-L1 [20] andnaturalkiller(NK)cells [29],Quanet alCD3,CD4,CD8,CD20,CD38,CD40 [28] [22].AlsoBatoolet alstudiedTILslevelatthetumour/hostinterface,in agroupof50patientswithoralsquamouscellcarcinoma,usingathree-tieredscale,asapartoftheir HistologicalRiskAssessment(worstpatternofinvasion, perineural invasion and lymphocytic infiltrate at interface), however, no statistical correlation was observedbetweentheTILslevelandoverallsurvival,localrecurrence-freesurvivalandlymphnoderecurrence-freesurvival [32].Inastudyconductedby Chatzistamou et al in a group of 52 patients with oraltonguesquamouscellcarcinoma,theTILslevel wasevaluatedintumourstromainatwo-tieredscale andaprognosticsignificancewasobservedbetween TILs level and disease free-survival (DFS), post relapse-survival (PRS) and disease related-mortality (DRM) [23].Xuet alinagroupof202patientswith oralsquamouscellcarcinoma,evaluatedtheTILslevelintumouralstroma,usingathree-tieredscale,and theirfindingsconfirmedthestatisticalcorrelationbe-tweentheTILslevelandadisease-freesurvival(DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) [24]. Furthermore, the TILs levels showed statistical correlation with DFS and DSS in univariate Cox-proportional hazard models, which is compatible to our study, where TILs levels correlated with OS and LRFS in univariateCox-proportionalhazardmodels.Inmul-tivariateCox-proportionalhazardmodelsTILslevels showedstatisticalcorrelationwithDFSandDSS(Xu et al) -in our study similar correlation was noted (OSandLRFS).Whatisstriking,thatinbothstudies in multivariate Cox-proportional hazard models the [22].…”