2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/630296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Polymorphisms of Phase I Metabolizing Genes with Sister Chromatid Exchanges in Occupational Workers Exposed to Toluene Used in Paint Thinners

Abstract: This study investigated genetic damage in paint workers mainly exposed to toluene as it is a major solvent used in paint thinners. Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) assay was used as biomarker of genotoxicity. Blood samples were collected from 30 paint workers and 30 control subjects matched with respect to age and other confounding factors except for exposure to toluene. SCE frequency was found to be significantly higher in paint workers (4.81 ± 0.92) as compared to control individuals (1.73 ± 0.54) (p < 0.05).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Negative results for the micronucleus test were reported in three out of six studies and positive results were obtained in the three other studies (Gonzalez-Yebra et al, 2009;Pitarque et al, 2002;Nise et al, 1991). No sign of DNA damage was found in eight out of 14 studies, whereas six studies reported DNA damage after toluene exposure (Moro et al, 2012;Heuser et al, 2005Heuser et al, , 2007Hammer et al, 1998;Priya et al, 2015;Bauchinger et al, 1982). However, in all the aforementioned studies describing positive effects, a possible coexposure to other drugs or smoking could not be excluded.…”
Section: Mutagenicity (Genotoxicity)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Negative results for the micronucleus test were reported in three out of six studies and positive results were obtained in the three other studies (Gonzalez-Yebra et al, 2009;Pitarque et al, 2002;Nise et al, 1991). No sign of DNA damage was found in eight out of 14 studies, whereas six studies reported DNA damage after toluene exposure (Moro et al, 2012;Heuser et al, 2005Heuser et al, , 2007Hammer et al, 1998;Priya et al, 2015;Bauchinger et al, 1982). However, in all the aforementioned studies describing positive effects, a possible coexposure to other drugs or smoking could not be excluded.…”
Section: Mutagenicity (Genotoxicity)mentioning
confidence: 94%