2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2015.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations Between PADI4 Gene Polymorphisms and Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Updated Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4b). Multiple studies have reported significant association between haplotypes of the PADI4 gene and rheumatoid arthritis, and PADI4 mRNA is expressed in pathological synovial tissues 32,33 , yet none have implicated this deletion, which flanks an annotated enhancer and is predicted to be the causal variant for increased PADI4 expression in lung. Finally, we recapitulate several SVs previously recognized as clinically associated markers, including an SVA retroelement insertion to a GWAS risk allele for melanoma and esophageal cancer ( r 2 = 0.85) 3436 , a ~32 kb deletion conferring risk for psoriasis 37 , and a ~37 kb deletion linked to circulating liver enzyme levels (gamma-glutamyl transferase) 38 (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4b). Multiple studies have reported significant association between haplotypes of the PADI4 gene and rheumatoid arthritis, and PADI4 mRNA is expressed in pathological synovial tissues 32,33 , yet none have implicated this deletion, which flanks an annotated enhancer and is predicted to be the causal variant for increased PADI4 expression in lung. Finally, we recapitulate several SVs previously recognized as clinically associated markers, including an SVA retroelement insertion to a GWAS risk allele for melanoma and esophageal cancer ( r 2 = 0.85) 3436 , a ~32 kb deletion conferring risk for psoriasis 37 , and a ~37 kb deletion linked to circulating liver enzyme levels (gamma-glutamyl transferase) 38 (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the well-known multifactorial nature of RA, genetic factors are considered to be the strongest determinants of this disease, encouraging researchers to search for the responsible genes (Turesson and Matteson, 2006;Yang et al, 2015). The first positive association between PADI4-104C/T and RA was reported in a Japanese population (Suzuki et al, 2003); several studies have attempted to replicate this association since then.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several meta-analyses have been previously conducted on RA in the Asian and Caucasian populations, with conflicting results (Lee et al, 2007;Hou et al, 2013;Lee and Bae, 2015;Yang et al, 2015). This meta-analysis was performed to filter out the influence of different genetic backgrounds on the relationship between the PADI4-104C/T polymorphism and risk of RA in a Chinese population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to the present time, there are five published meta-analyses regarding the PADI4 -94G/A polymorphism and RA risk (Iwamoto et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2007;Takata et al, 2008;Hou et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2015). Of these, two meta-analyses reported that there was significant association between the PADI4 -94G/A polymorphism and RA risk both in the Asian and European populations (Iwamoto et al, 2006;Takata et al, 2008), while two meta-analyses reported that there was significant association only in Asian individuals (Hou et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2015). Meta-analysis is a powerful statistical method that could improve the reliability of the conflicting results regarding the same topic and could identify the reason for the variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the previous meta-analyses (Iwamoto et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2007;Takata et al, 2008;Hou et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2015), the current study included more research studies on the Chinese population. The effects of gene-environment interactions with respect to RA risk were also studied by subgroup analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%